Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kacper Zuk vs Philip Florig Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zuk vs Florig analysis and find out who is favored!
Kacper Zuk vs Philip Florig Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zuk has won 56.41% of points on his second serve, while Florig has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zuk, in recent form, has won 48.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Florig has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 19.49% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zuk has saved 63.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Florig has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zuk has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 15/ 20), with Florig winning 46.43% (W/L 13/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zuk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 87/ 49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Florig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 24/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Zuk has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 10/ 12), where as Florig has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 13/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zuk winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zuk winning 2 and Florig winning 0. The last match between Zuk and Florig was at the Braunschweig Challenger, 03-07-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Kacper Zuk getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:6:54.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zuk and Florig have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zuk winning 0 times and Florig 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zuk winning 0, and Florig 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zuk has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.69 while Florig has played against players with an average rank of 178.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zuk has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Florig has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zuk has converted 30.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Florig has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zuk 1 - 0 Florig
631
Rank
162
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
851
Rank
842
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
59% (226-155)
Career Total W/L
42% (40-55)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$75,150
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kacper Zuk | Philip Florig |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:6:54 | 2:6:54 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (58/105) | 53% (41/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (38/58) | 66% (27/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (24/47) | 43% (16/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (35/78) | 41% (43/105) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats 
Kacper Zuk
Player
Philip Florig
55%
(
58 of
105)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
43 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kacper Zuk | Philip Florig |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (48/55) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:2 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 263.5 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (222/318) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (146/222) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 57% (55/96) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (8/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 30% (87/292) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Kacper Zuk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Kacper Zuk
47%
(
27 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alastair Gray
Player
Kacper Zuk
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
16
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
54 of
69)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Viktor Frydrych
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Pecci
Player
Kacper Zuk
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
Kacper Zuk
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
108)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Kacper Zuk
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Kacper Zuk
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
13
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
97%
(
38 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
8 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Adrian Andreev
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
5
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(12) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Jiri Vesely
54%
(
55 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
10
Aces
17
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
63%
(
29 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Petr Nouza
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
8
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Philip Florig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Philip Florig
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
49
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henrique Rocha
Player
Philip Florig
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
47%
(
20 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
52
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(6) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Philip Florig
48%
(
48 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
112)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
6-2 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominik Boehler
Player
Philip Florig
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Florig
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
2
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Philip Florig
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Philip Florig
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
20
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
17 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Florig
Player
Arthur Nagel
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Florig
Player
Mariano Dedura-Palomero
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Philip Florig
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Zuk Vs Florig Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
