Justin Schlageter vs Manas Manoj Dhamne Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W L W W L
Form
L L W L W L W W L LH2H: Schlageter 1 - 0 Dhamne
They have played 3 sets in total, with Schlageter winning 2 and Dhamne winning 1. The last match between Schlageter and Dhamne was at the M25 Reggio Emilia, 15-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Justin Schlageter getting the victory 6-4 4-6 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Justin Schlageter | 1 |
| Manas Manoj Dhamne | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Reggio Emilia(15-05-2025)
Justin Schlageter
Manas Manoj Dhamne
6
4
4
6
7
5
| Schlageter | Stats | Dhamne |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (26-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (33-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 725 |
| Highest Rank | 716 | |
| 24 | Age | 17 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 61% (55-35) | Career Total W/L | 59% (75-53) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Hanfmann PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
17 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Portero VS Etcheverry PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Schlageter VS Dhamne H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Justin Schlageter
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
81 of
121)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
121)
111
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
Schlageter VS Dhamne H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 15 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 3:3:40 | Average Match Time | 3:3:40 |
| 62% (62/100) | 1st Serve % | 67% (81/121) |
| 73% (45/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (49/81) |
| 45% (17/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (23/40) |
| 29% (5/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 40% (49/121) | Return Points Win % | 38% (38/100) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Schlageter vs Dhamne Match Preview :
- When it comes to second serve performance in the recent six months, Schlageter dominates with 44.74% of points won, slightly edging out Dhamne who has secured 44.51%.
- Is there a key stat to predict match outcomes? Schlageter's slight edge in second serve points might tip the balance.
- In return game statistics, Schlageter has won 50.65% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Dhamne's 47.34%.
- Dhamne demonstrates superior skills on first serve returns, winning 32.4% of points versus Schlageter's 26.02%.
- How do they respond under pressure? Dhamne saves 49.24% of breakpoints, outperforming Schlageter's 41.57%.
- Over the past year, Schlageter has a higher match win percentage at 69.57%, whereas Dhamne stands at 63.89%.
- Both players thrive on Hard courts, with Schlageter having a 77% win rate and Dhamne a 62% win rate, showcasing their adaptability to this surface.
- A consideration of opponent levels reveals Schlageter often faces higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 170.32 compared to Dhamne's average opponent ranking of 334.79.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Schlageter's 75% win rate gives them an edge over Dhamne's 61% success rate in all matches played.
- In the context of breakpoint conversion, Dhamne narrowly leads with a conversion rate of 39.62%, while Schlageter follows closely at 38.98%.
Editorial Prediction (May 15, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the comparative aspects of their recent performances, it's evident that Schlageter has a slight advantage in second serve points and is more adept at facing higher-caliber opponents.
However, Dhamne shows strength in returning first serve points and handling breakpoints under pressure, which could influence the match significantly.
Both players exhibit competence on Hard courts, but Schlageter's success in deciding sets coupled with their overall higher match win percentage could prove decisive.
Considering all factors, Schlageter seems poised as the likely winner in this upcoming tennis match, edged by a marginal but consistent superiority across several key performance metrics.
Schlageter vs Dhamne Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Justin Schlageter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Prechtel
Player
Justin Schlageter
64%
(
72 of
113)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
113)
6
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
50 of
75)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Justin Schlageter
Player
Sebastian Sorger
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
81%
(
79 of
98)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
49 of
79)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
87
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justin Schlageter
Player
Denis Petak
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
77%
(
46 of
60)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Barrena
Player
Justin Schlageter
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justin Schlageter
Player
Jeremy Schifris
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
86%
(
81 of
94)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Justin Schlageter
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
8 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
46
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Justin Schlageter
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
81 of
121)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
121)
111
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justin Schlageter
Player
Georgii Kravchenko
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Manas Manoj Dhamne Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
78%
(
52 of
67)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Cachin
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
17 of
33)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Martin Krumich
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Andrej Martin
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
9
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Justin Schlageter
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
81 of
121)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
121)
111
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Alexander Weis
50%
(
7 of
14)
1st Serve %
74%
(
17 of
23)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
21
Total Points Won
16
|
3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
61%
(
67 of
110)
1st Serve %
67%
(
73 of
109)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
109)
114
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (55/35) | Win/Loss | 59% (75/53) |
| 57% (118/90) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (161/124) |
| 52% (1074/982) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (1413/1232) |
| 77% (23/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (41/25) |
| 58% (22/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (34/28) |
| 45% (10/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 154 | Aces Total | 53 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 133 | Total Double Faults | 187 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:12:36 |
| 202.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 355.45 |
| 58% (1782/3074) | 1st Serve % | 69% (3885/5632) |
| 68% (1206/1782) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (2319/3885) |
| 48% (616/1292) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (840/1747) |
| 37% (109/292) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (272/614) |
| 38% (1222/3198) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2392/5653) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 36% (4/7) |
| 62% (55/34) | Futures W/L | 62% (71/44) |
| 61% (55/90) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (74/125) |
| 65% (11/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (15/28) |
| 71% (20/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 66% (21/32) |
| 86% (50/43) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (69/65) |
| 14% (50/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (69/4) |
| 30% (40/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (59/11) |
Schlageter vs. Dhamne Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
