Justin Gimelstob vs John Van Lottum Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gimelstob vs Lottum analysis and find out who is favored!
Justin Gimelstob vs John Van Lottum Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gimelstob has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lottum has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gimelstob, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lottum has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gimelstob has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lottum has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gimelstob has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lottum winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gimelstob has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 57/ 41), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 32% (W/L 14/ 30). Lottum has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gimelstob has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lottum has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gimelstob has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lottum has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gimelstob has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lottum has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gimelstob 0 - 0 Lottum
7
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
47
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
48
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Justin Gimelstob | John Van Lottum |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Justin Gimelstob Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Justin Gimelstob
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philipp Kohlschreiber
Player
Justin Gimelstob
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Thomas Johansson
Player
Justin Gimelstob
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Justin Gimelstob
Player
Lukasz Kubot
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andy Roddick
Player
Justin Gimelstob
77%
(
66 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
17
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
88%
(
58 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
18 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(6) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Evgeny Korolev
Player
Justin Gimelstob
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
69)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Vince Spadea
Player
Justin Gimelstob
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andy Roddick
Player
Justin Gimelstob
74%
(
72 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
120)
16
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
9
85%
(
61 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
51 of
71)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
22 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
120)
123
Total Points Won
94
|
6-1 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
John Van Lottum Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Wayne Arthurs
Player
John van Lottum
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
15
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
John van Lottum
Player
Ricardo Mello
56%
(
69 of
123)
1st Serve %
69%
(
92 of
133)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
61 of
92)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
51 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
56 of
133)
128
Total Points Won
128
|
3-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Radek Stepanek
Player
John van Lottum
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
John van Lottum
Player
Lars Uebel
49%
(
37 of
76)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
John van Lottum
Player
Jean-Rene Lisnard
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more