Justin Boulais vs Giles Hussey Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 May at 10:29 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Boulais vs G. Hussey

CAN
2
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Boulais 2 - 0 Hussey
They have played 6 sets in total, with Justin Boulais winning 4 and Giles Hussey winning 2. The last match between Justin Boulais and Giles Hussey was at the M25 Nottingham, 01-05-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Justin Boulais getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Boulais | 2 |
| Hussey | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Nottingham(05-01-25)
(F) M25 Edmonton(11-05-23)
J. Boulais vs G. Hussey H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $12,990 |
| 49.73% (92-93) | Career Total W/L | 62.62% (201-120) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 8 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Boulais vs G. Hussey Match Preview:
In analyzing the second serve capabilities over the past six months, Hussey has managed to win 46.15% of these points, while Boulais has secured 44.27%. This particular metric often correlates strongly with the likelihood of match success. Furthermore, Hussey's performance against opponents' second serves reveals a win rate of 41.27%, contrasted with Boulais's slightly superior 46.72% in this area. In terms of first serve return effectiveness, Hussey has achieved 30.65% against Boulais’s 29.79%. Such statistics are instrumental in discerning which player might have the upper hand in this head-to-head confrontation.
When placed under pressure, particularly in saving breakpoints, Hussey demonstrates a 54.88% success rate, slightly ahead of Boulais’s 51.19%. These figures are significant for making informed predictions during in-game wagering. Over the past year, Hussey has emerged victorious in 57.5% of his matches (23 wins and 17 losses), while Boulais follows closely with a 56.1% win rate (23 wins and 18 losses). This provides a foundational comparison between the two competitors in terms of overall match performance.
Focusing on surface preferences, Hussey's highest winning percentage of 67% resides on Hard courts, compared to a lower 25% on Grass. Similarly, Boulais’s ideal playing surface is also Hard, reflecting a 55% win record, whereas he struggles more on Clay with a 31% success rate. Regarding tournament experience, Hussey and Boulais have primarily competed in ITF $10K-level tournaments, with Hussey winning 70% and Boulais 64.52% of these encounters. The level of competition at these events is a critical consideration when evaluating their respective statistics.
The rivals have locked horns only once in official play, with the sole match seeing Boulais triumph in three sets. The historical victory came at the M 25 Edmonton event on indoor hard courts, where Boulais overturned a set deficit to win 3-6, 7-6(1), 6-0. This past encounter spanned an average duration of 2 hours and 24 minutes, showcasing Boulais's edge in decisive set scenarios with previous head-to-head set wins pegged at 2-1 in his favor.
In tie-breaking and extreme pressure plays, Boulais again has the upper hand, winning the solitary tiebreak recorded between them. Across all competitors in the past year, Boulais's opponents have maintained an average rank close to Hussey’s, standing at 406.98 versus 407.15. Turning to break point efficiency, Boulais holds a slight advantage, converting 36.13% of his opportunities, as opposed to Hussey’s 34.15%. This factor could play a pivotal role in live match predictions.
Anticipating a potential deciding set in the upcoming match would lean slightly in favor of Hussey, who has a 56% win rate compared to Boulais’s 47% over the past year. However, given the analytics and their previous matchups, Boulais’s past victory and marginally superior performance in critical moments place him as the anticipated winner in this possible clash.
Justin Boulais vs Giles Hussey Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Boulais vs G. Hussey H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 32 | Games Won | 21 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:18:43 | Average Match Time | 2:18:43 |
| 67% (118/176) | 1st Serve % | 70% (124/176) |
| 69% (81/118) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (77/124) |
| 53% (31/58) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (22/52) |
| 50% (9/18) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (5/13) |
| 44% (77/176) | Return Points Win % | 36% (64/176) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Boulais Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
G. Hussey Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 1-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(5) 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||

J. Boulais vs G. Hussey Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.73% (92/93) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.62% (201/120) |
| 50.95% (215/207) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.68% (444/300) |
| 50.39% (2028/1997) | Games Win/Loss | 53.64% (3777/3265) |
| 54.37% (56/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.85% (135/70) |
| 31.58% (6/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.71% (23/12) |
| 47.62% (30/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.67% (37/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 28.57% (6/15) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 453 | Aces Total | 888 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 540 | Total Double Faults | 757 |
| 1:26:49 | Average Match Time | 1:35:50 |
| 457.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 481.26 |
| 65% (6932/10726) | 1st Serve % | 63% (12247/19595) |
| 67% (4651/6932) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (8215/12247) |
| 49% (1873/3794) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3749/7348) |
| 39% (402/1036) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (920/2107) |
| 39% (4232/10855) | Return Points Win % | 41% (8183/19841) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 39.44% (28/43) | Challenger W/L | 51.43% (36/34) |
| 57.14% (64/48) | Futures W/L | 66.53% (163/82) |
| 50% (92/184) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (196/315) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 50% (27/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (46/93) |
| 43% (23/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (57/100) |
| 80% (99/79) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (197/166) |
| 20% (99/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (197/31) |
| 15% (85/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (124/35) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
