L. Neumayer
To Win
G. Elias
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W W W LForm
W W W W W L W W W LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Boulais winning 1 and Elias winning 2. The last match between Boulais and Elias was at the M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Gastao Elias getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Justin Boulais | 0 |
Gastao Elias | 1 |
M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio(19-02-2025)
25 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-6 6-3 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Gastao Elias
Player
Justin Boulais
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Predictions for the Upcoming Tennis Match:
Insights on Second Serve Performance: Analyzing their recent form over the past six months, it is evident that Boulais has excelled with an impressive 53.2% of points won on their second serve. On the other hand, Elias has demonstrated a slightly lower success rate of 45.23%. This statistical analysis holds great significance as it exhibits a substantial correlation with match prediction accuracy.
Return Game Statistics: Delving into return game stats, Boulais has showcased exceptional prowess by winning 53.86% of their opponent's second serve points in recent form. Elias, too, has exhibited commendable performance, securing 52.72% in this aspect. When considering first serve returns, Boulais has achieved a record of 36.47% while Elias has demonstrated a success rate of 34.15%. These statistics play a pivotal role in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup, as they bear a strong correlation to match outcomes.
Under Pressure Analysis: Examining their ability to save breakpoints, Boulais has effectively saved 57.72% of such critical points in recent form. Comparatively, Elias has showcased a slightly lower success rate of 54.22%. This particular statistic holds immense value for accurate in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview: Reflecting on their performances over the past year, Boulais has achieved a balanced win-loss ratio of 50%, winning 15 out of 30 matches. Elias, in turn, has secured a slightly higher success rate of 52.17%, triumphing in 36 out of 69 matches. This comprehensive overview allows for a broader prediction analysis of their head-to-head matchup.
Surface Specialization: Analyzing their respective career win percentages on different surfaces: Boulais has showcased their exceptional skills on Hard courts, winning 52% of matches (34 out of 66), whereas their performance on Clay courts has been relatively weaker, with a win percentage of 31% (5 out of 16). Elias, on the other hand, has exhibited remarkable prowess on Clay courts, achieving a win percentage of 57% (363 out of 632). However, their performance on Grass courts has been less impressive, with a win percentage of 25% (3 out of 12).
Player Level Analysis: An evaluation of their match history reveals that, over the past year, Boulais has predominantly participated in the lower-tier Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a win percentage of 60% (12 out of 20). Conversely, Elias has engaged in higher-level Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, emerging triumphant in 50.82% of matches (31 out of 61). Thus, when predicting the favorite player, it is crucial to consider their performance relative to the event level at which they have been competing.
Opponent Quality: Over the course of the past 12 months, Boulais has encountered opponents with an average rank of 402.07, while Elias has faced players with an average rank of 300.8. This comparison offers valuable insights into their respective challenges and the level of competition they have encountered.
Deciding Set Performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is important to examine the players' performances in deciding sets. Boulais has displayed a success rate of 30% in winning such sets over the past 12 months, whereas Elias has exhibited a higher percentage of 47% in all matches played on tour. These statistics play a pivotal role in determining the anticipated outcomes.
Analysis of Current Event H2H Stats: While past player performance serves as a useful indicator in predicting tennis matches, it is imperative to redirect our attention to the current event. Studying current event statistics allows us to gauge the form and performance levels of the players. With this in mind, it is advisable to review the section below for up-to-date insights (provided they have competed in the current event). Additionally, some players tend to deliver superior performances at specific events, adding another layer of consideration when making outcome predictions.
Break Point Conversion: Assessing recent form, Boulais has impressively converted 47.48% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Elias has demonstrated a slightly higher rate of success, converting 50.75% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic proves invaluable when seeking in-game live betting tips, particularly when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in exploring models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. However, please note that it caters primarily to statisticians and enthusiasts.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | w/o | H2H | |||
SF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Justin Boulais
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 6-7(4) 10-8 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Justin Boulais
Player
Liam Broady
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
63 of
110)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
101
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Justin Boulais
Player
Tiago Pereira
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
22%
(
13 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yi Zhou
Player
Justin Boulais
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Justin Boulais
Player
Rafael Izquierdo Luque
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gastao Elias
Player
Justin Boulais
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Justin Boulais
Player
Miguel Semedo
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
![]() ![]()
Tiago Pereira
Player
Gastao Elias
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Gastao Elias
Player
Francisco Rocha
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Gastao Elias
Player
Cannon Kingsley
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gastao Elias
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
George Loffhagen
Player
Gastao Elias
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-7(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gastao Elias
Player
Cannon Kingsley
47%
(
43 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
116)
104
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(3) 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Gastao Elias
Player
Ryan Peniston
45%
(
9 of
20)
1st Serve %
40%
(
2 of
5)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
13
Total Points Won
12
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Gastao Elias
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
50%
(
59 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
103)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
42%
(
25 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
53 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
117
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Gastao Elias
Player
Sergey Fomin
49%
(
44 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Gastao Elias
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
49%
(
35 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H |
view more