Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jurij Rodionov vs Leopold Zima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rodionov vs Zima analysis and find out who is favored!
Jurij Rodionov vs Leopold Zima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rodionov has won 49.2% of points on his second serve, while Zima has won 41.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rodionov, in recent form, has won 50.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zima has won 46.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.17% and 29.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rodionov has saved 58.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zima has saved 55.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rodionov has won 54.29% of matches played (W/L 38/ 32), with Zima winning 55.77% (W/L 29/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rodionov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 95/ 57), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13). Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 58/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Rodionov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 22/ 14), where as Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.86% of matches (W/L 29/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Rodionov winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Rodionov winning 4 and Zima winning 0. The last match between Rodionov and Zima was at the Eckental Challenger, 28-10-2019, First, Carpet with Jurij Rodionov getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:16.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rodionov and Zima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Rodionov winning 0 times and Zima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Rodionov winning 1, and Zima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rodionov has played against opponents with an average rank of 264.6 while Zima has played against players with an average rank of 134.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rodionov has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zima has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rodionov has converted 38.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zima has converted 45.45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rodionov 2 - 0 Zima
118
Rank
87
High
24
Age
L
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
2
Indoor0
0
Grass0
895
Rank
774
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
58% (263-193)
Career Total W/L
56% (155-123)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
65% (15-8)
$527,715
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jurij Rodionov | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 15 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:16 | 1:11:16 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (83/135) | 59% (79/133) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (62/83) | 71% (56/79) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (30/52) | 50% (27/54) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (50/133) | 32% (43/135) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Leopold Zima
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Leopold Zima
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jurij Rodionov | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (11/10) | 65% (15/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (25/22) | 60% (32/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (242/218) | 53% (281/248) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (6/3) | 70% (7/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.49 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 110 | 64 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 23 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:40 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 265.9 | 133.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (895/1443) | 69% (528/770) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (641/895) | 72% (378/528) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (273/548) | 43% (104/242) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (55/145) | 41% (24/58) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (563/1466) | 35% (251/727) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (15/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (11/21) | 65% (15/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 13% (8/1) |
Jurij Rodionov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jurij Rodionov
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Aleksandar Vukic
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Jurij Rodionov
71%
(
70 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
20%
(
10 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Denis Yevseyev
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cristian Garin
Player
Jurij Rodionov
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Jurij Rodionov
89%
(
77 of
87)
1st Serve %
100%
(
78 of
78)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(3) 7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Jurij Rodionov
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Jurij Rodionov
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Emanuele Turconi
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Leopold Zima
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rodionov Vs Zima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
