TBD
To Win
D. Svrcina
To Win
Jurij Rodionov vs Dalibor Svrcina Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W L L
Form
L W W W W W W L W WH2H: Rodionov 0 - 1 Svrcina
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rodionov winning 0 and Svrcina winning 2. The last match between Rodionov and Svrcina was at the Pune Challenger, 19-02-2025, Second, Hard with Dalibor Svrcina getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jurij Rodionov | 0 |
| Dalibor Svrcina | 1 |
Pune Challenger(19-02-2025)
6
4
7
5
| Rodionov | Stats | Svrcina |
|---|---|---|
| 62% (13-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 71% (17-7) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 197 | Ranking | 165 |
| 87 | Highest Rank | 154 |
| 25 | Age | 22 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 6 |
| 57% (292-224) | Career Total W/L | 58% (180-129) |
| $527,715 | Career Prize Money | $338,660 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
TBD VS Svrcina
- / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Zverev VS Fils PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
26 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Dimitrov PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Jurij Rodionov
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 9 | Games Won | 13 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:38:39 | Average Match Time | 1:38:39 |
| 70% (46/66) | 1st Serve % | 70% (50/71) |
| 70% (32/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (36/50) |
| 50% (10/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 62% (13/21) |
| 14% (1/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 31% (22/71) | Return Points Win % | 36% (24/66) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jurij Rodionov vs Dalibor Svrcina Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jurij Rodionov 0 - 1 Dalibor Svrcina
Predictions Insights for Upcoming Tennis Match
Recent Form Analysis:
In the last six months, there has been a notable discrepancy in the second serve performance between Rodionov and Svrcina. Rodionov, with an impressive 48.79% success rate, has outperformed Svrcina, who managed to win 43.65% of points on their second serve. This statistical aspect has demonstrated a significant correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.
Return Game Evaluation:
Examining their recent performances, Rodionov has proven to be quite formidable in return games. They have won an impressive 50.47% of their opponent's second serve points. However, Svrcina is not far behind, boasting a success rate of 60.26%. Regarding first serve returns, Rodionov's rate stands at 29.31%, while Svrcina's sits comfortably at 40.88%. These statistics provide valuable insights when determining the favored player in this eagerly anticipated head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis:
In times of intense pressure, Rodionov has demonstrated remarkable resilience by saving 60.98% of breakpoints in recent matches. Conversely, Svrcina has saved 51.88% of breakpoints, illuminating an important statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview:
The analysis of their overall performance in the past year reveals intriguing details. Rodionov has achieved victory in only 45.9% of matches played (W/L28/33), while Svrcina has boasted an impressive win rate of 60.81% (W/L45/29). These figures provide a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
Surface Proficiency:
When considering their best career surface, Rodionov has exhibited exceptional success on hard courts (I.hard), winning an impressive 62% (W/L101/62). In contrast, their performance on grass courts is less favorable, with a win rate of only 41% (W/L11/16). Similarly, Svrcina excels on hard courts, maintaining a 62% win rate (W/L13/8), while struggling on grass courts, winning only 25% of matches (W/L1/3).
Player Level:
Evaluating the level at which each player has competed, Rodionov has predominantly participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize fund exceeding $10,000. Within this realm, they have achieved success in 51.16% of matches played (W/L22/21). In comparison, Svrcina's focus has also been on Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize fund exceeding $10,000, where they have displayed an impressive performance rate of 58.49% (W/L31/22). The context of the event level holds significance when comparing the statistics to predict the likely favorite.
Opponent Quality Assessment:
During the preceding twelve months, Rodionov faced opponents with an average ranking of 222.66. On the other hand, Svrcina encountered players with an average ranking of 280.11. These opponent quality statistics shed light on the competition level each player has encountered.
Deciding Set Performance:
For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is worth noting that Rodionov has proven themselves in deciding sets, winning 46% of such matches over the past year. Meanwhile, Svrcina has displayed an even stronger performance in all matches played on tour, emerging victorious in 70% of deciding sets.
Current Event Head-to-Head Stats:
While past player performance holds valuable insight in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics that indicate the form of each player. Therefore, referring to the section below (if applicable) to see the players' match performance in the current event is highly recommended. Additionally, some players exhibit exceptional skills at specific events, which should be taken into account when making predictions.
Break Point Conversion:
Analyzing recent form, Rodionov has displayed a 41.5% conversion rate when presented with breakpoint opportunities. Conversely, Svrcina has proven to be slightly more proficient, converting 48.99% of their chances to break their opponent's serve. This statistic comes to the fore, particularly for in-game live betting tips, whenever a player has a definitive breakpoint opportunity.
If you are intrigued by models that accurately predict tennis matches, this informative article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: Reserved for the passionate statisticians).
Jurij Rodionov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Jurij Rodionov
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Jurij Rodionov
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Matteo Martineau
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Loann Massard
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
18 of
39)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Jakub Paul
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Jurij Rodionov
59%
(
67 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
90 of
136)
23
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
55 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
64 of
90)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
29%
(
33 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
49 of
136)
130
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(2) 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Jan Choinski
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Jakub Paul
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Jurij Rodionov
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Dalibor Svrcina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Giovanni Fonio
69%
(
77 of
111)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
105)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
48 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
112
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(2) 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve %
80%
(
74 of
93)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
83
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-4 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Andrej Martin
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Brandon Holt
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(8) 6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Ilia Simakin
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Jurij Rodionov
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
August Holmgren
77%
(
73 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
81 of
114)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
51 of
81)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
114)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (292/224) | Win/Loss | 58% (180/129) |
| 55% (684/553) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (404/325) |
| 51% (6147/5805) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3492/3180) |
| 56% (72/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (75/47) |
| 54% (96/81) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (90/70) |
| 62% (113/70) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (14/9) |
| 41% (11/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 2573 | Aces Total | 323 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 1324 | Total Double Faults | 1282 |
| 1:33:28 | Average Match Time | 1:40:23 |
| 401.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 388.16 |
| 61% (21881/35856) | 1st Serve % | 67% (14266/21182) |
| 71% (15447/21881) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (8864/14266) |
| 50% (6924/13975) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2973/6916) |
| 41% (1283/3127) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1271/2624) |
| 37% (13245/35350) | Return Points Win % | 45% (9630/21177) |
| 46% (16/19) | Slam W/L | 48% (10/11) |
| 30% (3/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (5/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (28/38) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (4/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (192/129) | Challenger W/L | 56% (102/81) |
| 65% (48/26) | Futures W/L | 70% (64/28) |
| 56% (287/508) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (168/293) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (6/10) |
| 55% (106/194) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (33/64) |
| 50% (101/201) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (62/107) |
| 82% (289/238) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (172/145) |
| 18% (289/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (172/27) |
| 24% (227/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (137/36) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Dalibor Svrcina
View full predicted draw for Svrcina
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
