Jung-Woong Na vs Adam Hubble Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Na vs Hubble analysis and find out who is favored!
Jung-Woong Na vs Adam Hubble Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Na has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hubble has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Na, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hubble has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Na has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hubble has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Na has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 4/ 3), with Hubble winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Na has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 30/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Hubble has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 36/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Na has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 4/ 3), where as Hubble has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Na winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Na winning 2 and Hubble winning 1. The last match between Na and Hubble was at the Korea F1, 14-05-2012, Quarterfinals, Hard with Jung-Woong Na getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Na and Hubble have played a deciding set 1 times, with Na winning 1 times and Hubble 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Na winning 1, and Hubble 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Na has played against opponents with an average rank of 94 while Hubble has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Na has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hubble has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Na has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hubble has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Na 1 - 0 Hubble
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
898
Rank
404
High
31
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
38
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
61% (201-131)
Career Total W/L
42% (54-75)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jung-Woong Na | Adam Hubble |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 20 | 18 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 7-5 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jung-Woong Na | Adam Hubble |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jung-Woong Na Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Jae Myeong Lee
Player
Jung-Woong Na
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
81%
(
55 of
68)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
Jung-Woong Na
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jung-Woong Na
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jung-Woong Na
Player
Young Seok Lee
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Jung-Woong Na
Player
Young Seok Kim
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jung-Woong Na
Player
Yongjun Shim
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jake Delaney
Player
Jung-Woong Na
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
78 of
105)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
28 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryuki Matsuda
Player
Jung-Woong Na
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 3-6 7-6(7) 10-7 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Matija Pecotic
Player
Jung-Woong Na
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Adam Hubble Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Adam Hubble
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
76%
(
37 of
49)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Adam Hubble
Player
David Barclay
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Adam Hubble
Player
Dayne Kelly
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
56
Total Points Won
54
|
4-6 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Keita Koyama
Player
Adam Hubble
73%
(
83 of
113)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
38%
(
43 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Dane Webb
Player
Adam Hubble
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
2
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more