Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Juncheng Shang vs Jake VAN Emburgh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shang vs Emburgh analysis and find out who is favored!
Juncheng Shang vs Jake VAN Emburgh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shang has won 53.35% of points on his second serve, while Emburgh has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shang, in recent form, has won 47.3% of his opponent's second serve points, while Emburgh has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.85% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shang has saved 63.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emburgh has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shang has won 61.02% of matches played (W/L 36/ 23), with Emburgh winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 33/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7). Emburgh has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Shang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9), where as Emburgh has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shang has played against opponents with an average rank of 220.31 while Emburgh has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shang has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emburgh has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shang has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emburgh has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shang 0 - 0 Emburgh
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Juncheng Shang | Jake VAN Emburgh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (12/7) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (29/22) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (252/243) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 61 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 42 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:19 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 108.63 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (963/1574) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (664/963) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (331/611) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (52/158) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (582/1559) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 67% (4/2) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (10/16) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 44% (9/4) | 1st Match |
Juncheng Shang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Tomas Machac
Player
Juncheng Shang
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Hugo Grenier
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Juncheng Shang
77%
(
68 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Juncheng Shang
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
69%
(
74 of
108)
1st Serve %
70%
(
87 of
124)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
50 of
124)
116
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Juncheng Shang
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Jordan Thompson
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Facundo Bagnis
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jake VAN Emburgh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandros Skorilas
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Phoenix Weir
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Timothee Andriveau
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Overmyer
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Shang Vs Emburgh Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
