Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julita Saner vs Emelie Gabran Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Saner vs Gabran analysis and find out who is favored!
Julita Saner vs Emelie Gabran Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Saner has won 41.95% of points on his second serve, while Gabran has won 37.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Saner, in recent form, has won 54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gabran has won 46.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.45% and 35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Saner has saved 41.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gabran has saved 70% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Saner has won 41.94% of matches played (W/L 13/ 18), with Gabran winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Saner has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 28/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 46/ 57). Gabran has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Saner has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44% of matches (W/L 11/ 14), where as Gabran has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Saner winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Saner winning 2 and Gabran winning 0. The last match between Saner and Gabran was at the W25 Helsinki, 13-11-2022, Q1 round, I.hard with Julita Saner getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Saner and Gabran have played a deciding set 0 times, with Saner winning 0 times and Gabran 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Saner winning 0, and Gabran 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Saner has played against opponents with an average rank of 112.16 while Gabran has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Saner has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gabran has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Saner has converted 48.54% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gabran has converted 75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Saner 1 - 0 Gabran
869
Rank
763
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
48% (128-136)
Career Total W/L
22% (2-7)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Julita Saner | Emelie Gabran |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:0 | 1:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (29/54) | 63% (40/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (22/29) | 53% (21/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (10/25) | 29% (7/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (36/64) | 41% (22/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Julita Saner
Player
Emelie Gabran
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julita Saner | Emelie Gabran |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 33% (1/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (72/58) | 44% (14/18) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.56 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 9 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (103/152) | 44% (27/62) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (64/103) | 78% (21/27) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (23/49) | 37% (13/35) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (9/21) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (67/153) | 38% (20/53) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (4/2) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (4/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Julita Saner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 3-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kayo Nishimura
Player
Julita Saner
72%
(
70 of
97)
1st Serve %
72%
(
66 of
92)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gaia Parravicini
Player
Julita Saner
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
57
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 1-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Zixuan Zeng
Player
Julita Saner
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
11
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
49 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
56 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Spigarelli
Player
Julita Saner
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Julita Saner
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julita Saner
Player
Sara Lanca
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
78%
(
47 of
60)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julita Saner
Player
Ferdaous Bahri
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Emelie Gabran Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Johanne Svendsen
Player
Emelie Gabran
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
1
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
54
|
2-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lara Schmidt
Player
Emelie Gabran
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julita Saner
Player
Emelie Gabran
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Beatrise Zeltina
Player
Emelie Gabran
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Agnes Mitteregger
Player
Emelie Gabran
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
2
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
26%
(
9 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 7-5 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Emelie Gabran
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
52
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emelie Gabran
Player
Shona Nakano
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 4-6 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Saner Vs Gabran Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
