Prediction of Juliette Trunet [] vs Lisa Claeys [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L W W L L
Form
W L L L W L W W L LHead-2-Head: Trunet 1 - 0 Claeys
They have played 2 sets in total, with Trunet winning 2 and Claeys winning 0. The last match between Trunet and Claeys was at the W15 Gonesse, 10-03-2025, Q3, Clay with Juliette Trunet getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Juliette Trunet | 1 |
| Lisa Claeys | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Juliette Trunet
Player
Lisa Claeys
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:4:3 | Average Match Time | 1:4:3 |
| 50% (24/48) | 1st Serve % | 59% (22/37) |
| 71% (17/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 36% (8/22) |
| 50% (12/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (5/15) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 65% (24/37) | Return Points Win % | 40% (19/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Juliette Trunet vs Lisa Claeys Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Trunet 1 - 0 Claeys
Editorial Prediction:
When analyzing the recent performance on second serves, Trunet has secured 39.69% of points, whereas Claeys has slightly outperformed with a success rate of 41.14%. This statistic is vital for predicting match outcomes. Furthermore, Claeys excels in return games, winning 62.57% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Trunet's 47.78%. For first serve returns, Claeys maintains an edge at 35.96%, compared to Trunet's 31.87%, which plays a significant role in head-to-head predictions.
Evaluating performance under pressure, Trunet has saved 53.85% of breakpoints in recent form, while Claeys has saved 50%. This difference might be pivotal for in-game betting predictions. In terms of converting breakpoints, Trunet has achieved a rate of 41.79%, better than Claeys' 35.82%, making it a crucial aspect for live betting tips.
Looking at overall performance, Trunet won 42.86% of matches over the past year, while Claeys managed a 50% win rate. When it comes to preferred playing surfaces, Trunet's best performance is on Hard courts with a 50% win rate, whereas Claeys shows a higher winning percentage on Indoor Hard courts at 67%. Opponent quality also varies, with Trunet facing opponents with an average rank of 431.76, while Claeys competed against those averaging a rank of 136.03.
In the past year, both players have predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, securing 50% win rates. When matches reach a deciding set, both players have clinched 60% of the time, demonstrating equal tenacity in decisive moments.
Based on these statistics, Claeys appears to have a slight edge overall owing to a stronger return game and better performance against higher-ranked opponents. However, Trunet's strong breakpoint conversion and stability under pressure narrow the gap, making the match poised to be competitive.
Juliette Trunet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Juliette Trunet
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pauline Payet
Player
Juliette Trunet
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juliette Trunet
Player
Lisa Claeys
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Juliette Trunet
Player
Lucie Vagnerova
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 2-6 7-6(6) 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Juliette Trunet
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arina Bulatova
Player
Juliette Trunet
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juliette Trunet
Player
Eva Zabolotnaia
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Lisa Claeys Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Zelinskaya
Player
Lisa Claeys
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Claeys
Player
Unknown Player
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
5
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
3
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 4-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Juliette Trunet
Player
Lisa Claeys
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lisa Claeys
Player
Zlata Bartanusz
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
26%
(
7 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
68
|
5-7 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margaux Komano
Player
Lisa Claeys
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-0 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Evelyne Atticia Tiron
Player
Lisa Claeys
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
31 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 43% (12/16) | Win/Loss | 44% (25/32) |
| 42% (26/36) | Sets Win/Loss | 46% (60/70) |
| 46% (282/330) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (626/655) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 39 | Aces Total | 15 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 62 | Total Double Faults | 103 |
| 1:11:54 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 399.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 122.18 |
| 57% (758/1325) | 1st Serve % | 63% (807/1285) |
| 59% (451/758) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (429/807) |
| 41% (233/567) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (188/478) |
| 42% (68/163) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (85/188) |
| 44% (593/1356) | Return Points Win % | 48% (646/1349) |
| 43% (12/28) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (25/56) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 67% (4/6) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (8/17) |
| 90% (10/9) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (29/23) |
| 10% (10/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (29/6) |
| 17% (18/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (28/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
