Prediction of Julie Heldman vs Cathy Lee Crosby Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Heldman vs C. Lee Crosby
Julie Heldman
USA
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
79
Age
80
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Cathy Lee Crosby
USA
l
l
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
79
Age
80
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Heldman 1 - 0 Crosby
They have played 2 sets in total, with Julie Heldman winning 2 and Cathy Lee Crosby winning 0. The last match between Julie Heldman and Cathy Lee Crosby was at the Phoenix, 23-03-1964, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Julie Heldman getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Heldman | 1 |
| Crosby | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R4) Phoenix(03-23-64)
Julie Heldman
6
6
Cathy Lee Crosby
2
1
J. Heldman vs C. L. Crosby H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 69.90% (534-230) | Career Total W/L | 39.22% (20-31) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Heldman vs C. L. Crosby Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Julie Heldman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cathy Lee Crosby has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Julie Heldman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cathy Lee Crosby has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Julie Heldman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cathy Lee Crosby has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Julie Heldman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cathy Lee Crosby winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Julie Heldman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 210/68), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 84/41). Cathy Lee Crosby has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 76% (W/L 14/12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/4).
- Player level: In the last year, Julie Heldman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cathy Lee Crosby has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Julie Heldman winning 1 times and Cathy Lee Crosby being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Julie Heldman winning 2 and Cathy Lee Crosby winning 0.
- The last match between Julie Heldman and Cathy Lee Crosby was at the Phoenix, 23-03-1964, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Julie Heldman getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Julie Heldman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cathy Lee Crosby has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Julie Heldman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cathy Lee Crosby has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Julie Heldman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cathy Lee Crosby has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Julie Heldman vs Cathy Lee Crosby Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Heldman vs C. L. Crosby H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Heldman 0%, Crosby 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Heldman 0%, Crosby 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Heldman 0%, Crosby 0%.
J. Heldman Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Unknown Tournament - 27-08-1975 | ||||
R3  Kazuko SawamatsuK. Sawamatsu | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R2 Sue StapS. Stap | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
 Westchester - 19-08-1975 | ||||
R4  Iris Riedel KuhnI. Riedel | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R3 Joanne RussellJ. Russell | W | 6-1 2-6 6-1 | ||
| Unknown Tournament - 11-08-1975 | ||||
R3  Glynis ColesG. Coles | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
C. L. Crosby Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles - 18-09-1967 | ||||
R3  Kerry ReidK. Reid | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R2 Tam OshaughnessyT. Oshaughnessy | W | 9-7 8-10 6-3 | ||
| Los Angeles - 15-09-1966 | ||||
R3 Mimi WheelerM. Wheeler | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q3 Marilyn ShapiroM. Shapiro | W | 8-6 6-2 | ||
R4 Tory Ann FretzT. Ann | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
J. Heldman vs C. L. Crosby Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.90% (534/230) | YTD Win/Loss | 39.22% (20/31) |
| 66.49% (1115/562) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.42% (41/63) |
| 57.73% (8676/6353) | Games Win/Loss | 44.03% (428/544) |
| 70.11% (61/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.85% (14/12) |
| 75.54% (210/68) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 60.14% (89/59) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67.20% (84/41) | Grass Win/Loss | 29.41% (5/12) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 20.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 0.43 |
| 64.58% (31/17) | Slam W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 65.52% (19/10) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 69.16% (74/33) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (520/740) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 34% (15/44) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 29% (5/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (117/185) | Deciding Set Win % | 36% (4/11) |
| 92% (499/459) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (19/16) |
| 8% (499/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (19/3) |
| 27% (251/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (28/1) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:00 PM 14/11/25
Prediction
M. Rosenkranz5M. Cassone4W1
1.69
W2
2.02
06:00 PM 14/11/25
Prediction
E. Ribeiro3WCN. ZanellatoW1
1.27
W2
3.38
08:00 PM 14/11/25
PredictionL. T. ByersWCG. YoungPRW1
2.83
W2
1.37
04:00 PM 14/11/25
Prediction
J. SinnerB. SheltonW1
1.067
W2
9.7
04:05 PM 14/11/25
PredictionA. BattistonWCG. Ferrari2W1
6.1
W2
1.088
05:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction
A. Weber1
K. Filar7W1
1.2
W2
4
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Ben Shelton Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Betting Tips & Picks November 14, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Ben Shelton Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Jannik Sinner vs Ben Shelton Betting Tips & Picks November 14, 2025
Top Predictions Today
Jannik SinnerAlex De Minaur16:05
H2H 12-0
Alexander Zverev
Felix Auger Aliassime22:30
H2H 6-3
Jannik SinnerBen Shelton16:00
H2H 7-1
Carlos Taberner
Tomas Barrios Vera02:00
H2H 0-1
Dan AddedJan-Lennard Struff17:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal