Julie Byrne vs Amelia Stuart Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Byrne vs Stuart analysis and find out who is favored!
Julie Byrne vs Amelia Stuart Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Byrne has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Stuart has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Byrne, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stuart has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Byrne has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stuart has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Byrne has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Stuart winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Byrne has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Stuart has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Byrne has played against opponents with an average rank of while Stuart has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Byrne has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stuart has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Byrne has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stuart has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Byrne 0 - 0 Stuart
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Julie Byrne | Amelia Stuart |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Julie Byrne Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Emily Appleton
Player
Julie Byrne
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Julie Byrne
Player
Lisa Ponomar
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
6
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Julie Byrne
Player
Rushri Wijesundera
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Julie Byrne
Player
Amelia Fortescue
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve %
52%
(
17 of
33)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
49
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Laura Deigman
Player
Julie Byrne
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Julie Byrne
Player
Gabriela Van De Graaf
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
10
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
8 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
49 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Amelia Stuart Recent Matches Played
No Past Matches Available