Julian Zlobinsky vs William Griffith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zlobinsky vs Griffith analysis and find out who is favored!
Julian Zlobinsky vs William Griffith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zlobinsky has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Griffith has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zlobinsky, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Griffith has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zlobinsky has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Griffith has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zlobinsky has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Griffith winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zlobinsky has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 13/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6). Griffith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 53/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zlobinsky winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zlobinsky winning 2 and Griffith winning 1. The last match between Zlobinsky and Griffith was at the USA F25, 25-07-2016, Q2 round, Hard with Julian Zlobinsky getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zlobinsky and Griffith have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zlobinsky winning 1 times and Griffith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zlobinsky winning 0, and Griffith 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zlobinsky has played against opponents with an average rank of while Griffith has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zlobinsky has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Griffith has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zlobinsky has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Griffith has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zlobinsky 1 - 0 Griffith
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
638
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (32-25)
Career Total W/L
55% (54-45)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Julian Zlobinsky | William Griffith |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 18 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 5-7 7-5 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Julian Zlobinsky | William Griffith |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Julian Zlobinsky Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Julian Zlobinsky
75%
(
85 of
113)
1st Serve %
47%
(
59 of
125)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
56 of
125)
122
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Julian Zlobinsky
Player
Brecht Catalan
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
45%
(
15 of
33)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Pre-Q | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alexander Brown
Player
Julian Zlobinsky
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Julian Zlobinsky
47%
(
32 of
68)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
William Griffith Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Gage Brymer
Player
William Griffith
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Li Tu
Player
William Griffith
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 7-6(4) 10-4 | H2H |
view more