Julian Onken vs Tommaso Schold Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Onken vs Schold analysis and find out who is favored!
Julian Onken vs Tommaso Schold Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Onken has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Schold has won 40%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Onken, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Schold has won 40.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 24.59% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Onken has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schold has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Onken has won 25% of matches played (W/L 1/ 3), with Schold winning 35.71% (W/L 5/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Onken has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 110/ 79), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Schold has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 23/ 20), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 28% (W/L 5/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Onken has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 1/ 3), where as Schold has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 35.71% of matches (W/L 5/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Onken winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Onken winning 2 and Schold winning 1. The last match between Onken and Schold was at the Morocco F2, 14-03-2016, Q3, Clay with Julian Onken getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Onken and Schold have played a deciding set 1 times, with Onken winning 1 times and Schold 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Onken winning 0, and Schold 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Onken has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Schold has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Onken has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schold has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Onken has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schold has converted 12.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Onken 1 - 0 Schold
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
892
Rank
693
High
35
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (122-90)
Career Total W/L
46% (28-33)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
43% (3-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Julian Onken | Tommaso Schold |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 18 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Julian Onken | Tommaso Schold |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 41% (7/10) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (86/91) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.09 |
DFs Total | 0 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 46% (27/59) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (17/27) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (13/32) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 30% (16/53) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
Julian Onken Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 4-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-2 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Julian Onken
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Julian Onken
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Louis Herman
Player
Julian Onken
42%
(
32 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Tommaso Schold Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-7(6) 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Denis Constantin Spiridon
Player
Tommaso Schold
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-7(4) 7-5 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
Player
Tommaso Schold
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
84%
(
67 of
80)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more