Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julian Lenz vs David Poljak Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lenz vs Poljak analysis and find out who is favored!
Julian Lenz vs David Poljak Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lenz has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Poljak has won 49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lenz, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Poljak has won 49.84%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lenz has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Poljak has saved 58.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lenz has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Poljak winning 40.48% (W/L 17/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lenz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 121/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Poljak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 103/ 72), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 104/ 107).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lenz winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lenz winning 2 and Poljak winning 0. The last match between Lenz and Poljak was at the Ismaning Challenger, 13-10-2018, Q1 round, Carpet with Julian Lenz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:6.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lenz and Poljak have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lenz winning 0 times and Poljak 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lenz winning 1, and Poljak 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lenz has played against opponents with an average rank of while Poljak has played against players with an average rank of 149.12.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lenz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Poljak has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lenz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Poljak has converted 34.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lenz 1 - 0 Poljak
864
Rank
227
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
893
Rank
370
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
55% (207-169)
Career Total W/L
54% (306-257)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
44% (8-10)
$25,665
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Julian Lenz | David Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 12 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:6 | 1:8:6 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (38/60) | 53% (31/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (32/38) | 81% (25/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 73% (16/22) | 46% (13/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/4) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (21/59) | 20% (12/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 6-2 |
Stats 
Julian Lenz
Player
David Poljak
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
5
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
20%
(
12 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julian Lenz | David Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (8/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (18/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (213/211) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/8) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.57 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 119 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:45:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 125.17 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (835/1375) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 74% (615/835) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (267/540) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 35% (40/115) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (482/1333) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (8/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 27% (11/3) |
Julian Lenz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Robin Haase
Player
Julian Lenz
61%
(
71 of
117)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
111)
11
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
79)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
41 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-2 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Dennis Novak
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
11
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
49 of
66)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
33 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Hazem Naow
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Mikalai Haliak
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Julian Lenz
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
19
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Aldin Setkic
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
14
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Andrew Paulson
58%
(
69 of
120)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
12
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
48 of
62)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
36 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
114
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Julian Lenz
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
28%
(
10 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Julian Lenz
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matej Vocel
Player
David Poljak
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
James Watt
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
81%
(
55 of
68)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Nikita Ianin
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikita Ianin
Player
David Poljak
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Joe Tyler
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
David Poljak
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
David Poljak
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
David Poljak
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
70 of
106)
26
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
87%
(
54 of
62)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
61 of
70)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
22 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
28 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(4) 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Lenz Vs Poljak Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
