Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julian Lenz vs Benjamin Hassan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lenz vs Hassan analysis and find out who is favored!
Julian Lenz vs Benjamin Hassan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lenz has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hassan has won 50.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lenz, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hassan has won 51.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lenz has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hassan has saved 60.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lenz has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Hassan winning 58.43% (W/L 52/ 37) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lenz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 121/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Hassan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 174/ 103), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Lenz winning 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Lenz winning 3 and Hassan winning 5. The last match between Lenz and Hassan was at the Troisdorf Challenger, 24-05-2022, First, Clay with Julian Lenz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lenz and Hassan have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lenz winning 1 times and Hassan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lenz winning 0, and Hassan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lenz has played against opponents with an average rank of while Hassan has played against players with an average rank of 265.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lenz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hassan has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lenz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hassan has converted 42.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lenz 1 - 2 Hassan
864
Rank
227
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
152
Rank
149
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
55% (207-169)
Career Total W/L
60% (278-182)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
44% (11-14)
$25,665
Career Prize Money
$113,580
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Julian Lenz | Benjamin Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 5 |
| Games Won | 36 | 36 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 12 |
| DFs (Total) | 12 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:21 | 1:54:21 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (153/239) | 60% (144/240) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (100/153) | 61% (88/144) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (41/86) | 59% (57/96) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (9/27) | 38% (9/24) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (95/240) | 41% (98/239) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Julian Lenz
Player
Benjamin Hassan
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 4-6 6-4 4-2 ret. |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Julian Lenz
56%
(
52 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
63%
(
26 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Julian Lenz
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julian Lenz | Benjamin Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (11/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (27/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (280/277) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.42 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 115 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 55 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:27:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 243.08 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (939/1633) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (655/939) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (363/694) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (57/135) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (616/1632) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (11/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 14% (14/2) |
Julian Lenz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Robin Haase
Player
Julian Lenz
61%
(
71 of
117)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
111)
11
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
79)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
41 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-2 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Dennis Novak
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
11
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
49 of
66)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
33 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Hazem Naow
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Mikalai Haliak
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Julian Lenz
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
19
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Aldin Setkic
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
14
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Andrew Paulson
58%
(
69 of
120)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
12
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
48 of
62)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
36 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
114
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Julian Lenz
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
28%
(
10 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Julian Lenz
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Benjamin Hassan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
7
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Carlos Taberner
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Benjamin Hassan
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
10
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Hamza Karmoussi
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Benjamin Hassan
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Cristian Garin
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Billy Harris
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lenz Vs Hassan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
