Julian Gimenez vs Biagio Gramaticopolo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gimenez vs Gramaticopolo analysis and find out who is favored!
Julian Gimenez vs Biagio Gramaticopolo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gimenez has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Gramaticopolo has won 43.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gimenez, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gramaticopolo has won 44.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gimenez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gramaticopolo has saved 47.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gimenez has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Gramaticopolo winning 47.37% (W/L 18/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gimenez has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 76/ 56), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 9/ 12). Gramaticopolo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Gimenez has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Gramaticopolo has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.37% of matches (W/L 18/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gimenez winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gimenez winning 2 and Gramaticopolo winning 1. The last match between Gimenez and Gramaticopolo was at the M15 Cairo, 13-09-2021, Q2 round, Clay with Julian Gimenez getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gimenez and Gramaticopolo have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gimenez winning 1 times and Gramaticopolo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gimenez winning 0, and Gramaticopolo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gimenez has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Gramaticopolo has played against players with an average rank of 75.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gimenez has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gramaticopolo has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gimenez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gramaticopolo has converted 42.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gimenez 1 - 0 Gramaticopolo
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (85-68)
Career Total W/L
47% (45-51)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
17% (1-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gimenez VS Gramaticopolo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Julian Gimenez | Biagio Gramaticopolo |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 18 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Gimenez VS Gramaticopolo H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-6 6-0 10-5 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Julian Gimenez | Biagio Gramaticopolo |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (1/5) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 29% (4/10) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (61/85) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.06 |
Aces Total | 0 | 4 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.14 |
DFs Total | 0 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 74.5 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 55% (108/198) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (62/108) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (42/90) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/15) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (65/186) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (1/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 17% (1/6) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Julian Gimenez Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Alex Barrena
Player
Julian Gimenez
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
R2 |
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Julian Gimenez
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Julian Gimenez
Player
Cayetano March
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Julian Gimenez
72%
(
82 of
114)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
47%
(
54 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF | 2-6 6-2 11-9 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Biagio Gramaticopolo Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Matthias Ujvary
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicola Rispoli
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Harrison Adams
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H |
view more