Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julia Vulpio vs Mika Dagan Fruchtman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vulpio vs Fruchtman analysis and find out who is favored!
Julia Vulpio vs Mika Dagan Fruchtman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vulpio has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Fruchtman has won 31.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vulpio, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fruchtman has won 48.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 36.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vulpio has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fruchtman has saved 31.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vulpio has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Fruchtman winning 44.44% (W/L 4/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vulpio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 13/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Fruchtman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 37/ 41).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vulpio winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Vulpio winning 2 and Fruchtman winning 1. The last match between Vulpio and Fruchtman was at the Akko, 01-05-2018, First, Hard with Julia Vulpio getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vulpio and Fruchtman have played a deciding set 1 times, with Vulpio winning 1 times and Fruchtman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vulpio winning 0, and Fruchtman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vulpio has played against opponents with an average rank of while Fruchtman has played against players with an average rank of 32.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vulpio has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fruchtman has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vulpio has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fruchtman has converted 29.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vulpio 1 - 0 Fruchtman
Ret.
Rank
900
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
894
Rank
771
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
33% (24-48)
Career Total W/L
50% (53-53)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Julia Vulpio | Mika Dagan Fruchtman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:0 | 1:51:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 43% (41/96) | 54% (41/76) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (28/41) | 68% (28/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (28/55) | 49% (17/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 31% (4/13) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (31/76) | 42% (40/96) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 1-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Julia Vulpio
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
43%
(
41 of
96)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
51%
(
28 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julia Vulpio | Mika Dagan Fruchtman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Julia Vulpio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alana Tuayeva
Player
Julia Vulpio
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
10
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miriana Tona
Player
Julia Vulpio
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miriana Tona
Player
Julia Vulpio
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ching-Wen Hsu
Player
Julia Vulpio
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Vulpio
Player
Rada Manataweewat
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Mika Dagan Fruchtman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kiara Cvetkovic
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michaela Laki
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
21 of
32)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natsuho Arakawa
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Julaluck Sae-Eung
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanni Liu
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Chompoothip Jandakate
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Nikita Liebkind
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
38 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Natcharee Teerachodjiranon
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Ogescu
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
17 of
29)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
13 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Vulpio Vs Fruchtman Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
