J. Stusek
To Win
M. Guth
To Win
Julia Stusek vs Lara Pfeifer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W W L W
Form
L L L L W L L W L WHead-2-Head: Stusek 1 - 0 Pfeifer
They have played 2 sets in total, with Stusek winning 2 and Pfeifer winning 0. The last match between Stusek and Pfeifer was at the W15 Bucharest, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Julia Stusek getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Julia Stusek | 1 |
| Lara Pfeifer | 0 |
W15 Bucharest(18-02-2025)
7
5
6
3
| Stusek | Stats | Pfeifer |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (8-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (6-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 857 | Ranking | 538 |
| 749 | Highest Rank | 531 |
| 16 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (22-16) | Career Total W/L | 52% (117-106) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
27 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
Upcoming Match
27 Mar 2025 / Second
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Dimitrov PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
27 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Julia Stusek
Player
Lara Pfeifer
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:29:20 | Average Match Time | 1:29:20 |
| 50% (33/66) | 1st Serve % | 53% (32/60) |
| 61% (20/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (16/32) |
| 58% (19/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (16/28) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 47% (28/60) | Return Points Win % | 41% (27/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Julia Stusek vs Lara Pfeifer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Julia Stusek 1 - 0 Lara Pfeifer
- Recent Trends in Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Stusek and Pfeifer have exhibited notable differences in their second serve performance. Stusek boasts a 39.13% success rate, while Pfeifer has demonstrated a slightly higher rate of 41.78%. It's worth noting that this statistical aspect bears a profound impact on accurately predicting match outcomes.
- Examining Return Game Statistics: Careful examination of return game statistics reveals intriguing disparities between Stusek and Pfeifer. In recent form, Stusek has triumphed in 42.5% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Pfeifer has dominated with a remarkable 54.49% success rate. Similarly, when it comes to first serve returns, Stusek secures victory in 26.23% of cases, while Pfeifer outshines with an impressive 47.08%. These figures hold significant influence over determining the favored contender in their impending head-to-head matchup.
- Analyzing Performance Under Pressure: Recent analysis indicates that Stusek and Pfeifer exhibit contrasting abilities to salvage breakpoints when under pressure. Stusek impressively saves 44.44% of breakpoints, while Pfeifer displays impeccable resilience, saving 47.34%. Unquestionably, this statistic may prove invaluable for in-game betting predictions.
- Comprehensive Performance Overview: Over the past year, Stusek has clinched victory in 28.57% of matches played, with a win-loss record of 2/5, in contrast to Pfeifer's remarkable performance of winning 59.02% of matches, demonstrating a remarkable win-loss record of 36/25. These figures provide a holistic overview of their head-to-head prediction.
- Exploiting the Best Surface: A meticulous examination of Stusek and Pfeifer's career surface win percentages illuminates intriguing disparities. Stusek thrives on hard courts with an impressive 71% win rate (W/L 5/2), while their performance dwindles on grass courts, failing to secure a single win with a 0% win rate (W/L 0/2). Conversely, Pfeifer excels on hard courts with a 57% win rate (W/L 85/65) but struggles on indoor hard courts, with no victories (W/L 0/5).
- Leveraging Player Level Analysis: Over the past year, Stusek primarily competed in Future, Satellites, and ITF tournaments worth $10K, triumphing in 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/1). On the other hand, Pfeifer predominantly honed their skills in comparable tournaments, winning 60.53% of matches (W/L 23/15). Therefore, when comparing statistics between players to predict the favorite, it's essential to consider the level at which they've been competing.
- Assessing Opponent Quality Statistics: In the last twelve months, Stusek has consistently battled opponents with an average rank of 210, while Pfeifer has faced more formidable competitors, with an average rank of 439.67. This aspect sheds light on the level of competition each player has encountered and must be incorporated into the prediction process.
- Decoding Deciding Set Performance: For live predictions and betting enthusiasts, it becomes crucial to examine how players perform during decisive sets. Remarkably, Stusek has struggled, failing to secure victory in any of the deciding sets played in the past twelve months. Conversely, Pfeifer has impressively won 44% of all matches played on tour that have reached a deciding set. This factor carries significant weight when deliberating on the possible match outcome.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While a player's historical performance serves as a valuable indicator for predicting tennis matches, it becomes equally important to account for their performance in the ongoing event. Hence, it is recommended to refer to the section below to ascertain an in-form player's recent performance within the current event. Additionally, certain players display enhanced performance at specific events, lending further insight into determining the ultimate outcome.
- Break Point Conversion Rates: To offer insightful in-game live betting tips, careful evaluation of recent form reveals that Stusek converts 37.5% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Pfeifer masterfully capitalizes on 54.19% of chances to break their opponents' serves. These figures provide invaluable guidance during critical moments in the match.
- If you seek models that proficiently predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent resource (Warning: Only for enthusiasts captivated by meticulous statistics).
Julia Stusek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Stusek
Player
Dominika Podhajecka
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Julia Stusek
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Stusek
Player
Clarissa Blomqvist
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Stusek
Player
Noemi Maines
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
13 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
41
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Stusek
Player
Tian Jialin
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
53%
(
44 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Kulikova
Player
Julia Stusek
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
8
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Stusek
Player
Johanne Svendsen
43%
(
37 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
3
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
4
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
50%
(
43 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anastasia Kulikova
Player
Julia Stusek
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Stusek
Player
Mara Gae
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
10
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Stusek
Player
Melissa Boyden
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
3 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
45
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Lara Pfeifer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lara Pfeifer
Player
Noemi Maines
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clarissa Blomqvist
Player
Lara Pfeifer
83%
(
5 of
6)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
1)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
5
Total Points Won
2
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lara Pfeifer
Player
Valeria Koussenkova
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
84%
(
43 of
51)
9
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Di Sarra
Player
Lara Pfeifer
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Lara Pfeifer
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Stusek
Player
Lara Pfeifer
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hephzibah Oluwadare
Player
Lara Pfeifer
52%
(
64 of
122)
1st Serve %
71%
(
78 of
110)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
48 of
78)
50%
(
29 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
43%
(
53 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
117
|
3-6 7-6(9) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joy De Zeeuw
Player
Lara Pfeifer
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Lara Pfeifer
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
80%
(
79 of
99)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (22/16) | Win/Loss | 52% (117/106) |
| 56% (47/37) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (256/232) |
| 53% (389/340) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2276/2131) |
| 75% (9/3) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (88/67) |
| 25% (1/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (29/31) |
| 60% (12/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/8) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 37 | Aces Total | 105 |
| 0.44 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 157 | Total Double Faults | 463 |
| 1:27:55 | Average Match Time | 1:13:45 |
| 380.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 425.87 |
| 62% (1436/2308) | 1st Serve % | 70% (7242/10388) |
| 60% (868/1436) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (4072/7242) |
| 45% (394/872) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1414/3146) |
| 49% (148/299) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (744/1431) |
| 46% (1008/2209) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5123/10613) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (12/10) | Challenger W/L | 44% (20/25) |
| 71% (10/4) | Futures W/L | 54% (97/81) |
| 58% (22/38) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (111/211) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (15/30) |
| 63% (5/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (25/52) |
| 91% (23/21) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (121/106) |
| 9% (23/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (121/15) |
| 7% (15/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (102/11) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Julia Stusek
View full predicted draw for Stusek
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Lara Pfeifer
View full predicted draw for Pfeifer
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
