Julia Kimmelmann vs Maddison Inglis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kimmelmann vs Inglis analysis and find out who is favored!
Julia Kimmelmann vs Maddison Inglis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kimmelmann has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Inglis has won 48.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kimmelmann, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Inglis has won 54.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 40.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kimmelmann has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Inglis has saved 57.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kimmelmann has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Inglis winning 62.71% (W/L 37/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kimmelmann has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 42/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 117/ 98). Inglis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 31/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Kimmelmann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.38% of matches (W/L 34/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kimmelmann winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kimmelmann winning 0 and Inglis winning 2. The last match between Kimmelmann and Inglis was at the Brisbane, 30-09-2018, Q2 round, Hard with Maddison Inglis getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kimmelmann and Inglis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kimmelmann winning 0 times and Inglis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kimmelmann winning 0, and Inglis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kimmelmann has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Inglis has played against players with an average rank of 289.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kimmelmann has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Inglis has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kimmelmann has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Inglis has converted 49.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kimmelmann 0 - 1 Inglis
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
871
Rank
350
High
30
Age
L
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
283
Rank
112
High
26
Age
R
Plays
7
Total
0
Mast
7
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (202-152)
Career Total W/L
59% (241-169)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
71% (10-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$423,460
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kimmelmann VS Inglis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Julia Kimmelmann | Maddison Inglis |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 4 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Kimmelmann VS Inglis H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Julia Kimmelmann | Maddison Inglis |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (10/4) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 70% (23/10) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (173/125) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/1) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.35 |
Aces Total | 0 | 50 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.31 |
DFs Total | 0 | 45 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:37:12 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 213.29 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (557/868) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (372/557) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (164/311) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 54% (56/104) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (426/934) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (8/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (10/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (8/8) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (6/2) |
Julia Kimmelmann Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Nicole Khirin
Player
Julia Kimmelmann
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Julia Kimmelmann
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Julia Kimmelmann
Player
Zoi Spyrou
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Oana Gavrila
Player
Julia Kimmelmann
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Julia Kimmelmann
Player
Sofia Rocchetti
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
19%
(
3 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
59
|
6-0 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Martha Matoula
Player
Julia Kimmelmann
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
84%
(
43 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
Julia Kimmelmann
Player
Sofia Rocchetti
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve %
83%
(
53 of
64)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Julia Kimmelmann
Player
Eleni Christofi
80%
(
91 of
114)
1st Serve %
74%
(
87 of
117)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
11
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
87)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
46%
(
53 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
117)
117
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Julia Kimmelmann
Player
Hwiwon Wi
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Maegan Manasse
Player
Maddison Inglis
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maddison Inglis
Player
Arianne Hartono
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sarah Rokusek
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maddison Inglis
Player
Amelia Zylberman
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
F | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
SF |
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sakura Hosogi
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Maddison Inglis
Player
Monique Barry
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maddison Inglis
Player
Elena Micic
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sienna Leeson
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more