Julia Grabher vs Kyoka Okamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W W L L L
Form
L L W W L L W W L LHead-2-Head: Grabher 1 - 0 Okamura
They have played 2 sets in total, with Grabher winning 2 and Okamura winning 0. The last match between Grabher and Okamura was at the W75 Brescia, 30-05-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Julia Grabher getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Julia Grabher | 1 |
| Kyoka Okamura | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W75 Brescia(30-05-2025)
Julia Grabher
Kyoka Okamura
7
6
6
4
| Grabher | Stats | Okamura |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (32-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (9-18) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 139 | Ranking | 187 |
| 54 | Highest Rank | 178 |
| 29 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 17 | Titles | 3 |
| 60% (396-263) | Career Total W/L | 54% (362-313) |
| $402,254 | Career Prize Money | $75,106 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Anisimova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
Julia Grabher
Player
Kyoka Okamura
81%
(
55 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:46:28 | Average Match Time | 1:46:28 |
| 81% (55/68) | 1st Serve % | 67% (46/69) |
| 65% (36/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (26/46) |
| 31% (4/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (7/23) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (4/7) |
| 52% (36/69) | Return Points Win % | 41% (28/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Grabher vs Okamura Match Preview :
- Recent second serve performance: Grabher leads slightly with a 38.25% win rate, compared to Okamura's 37.93%. Does this small margin significantly tilt the scales in Grabher's favor? Historical data suggests it might.
- Return game prowess: Okamura excels here, winning 51% of points on second serve returns, outpacing Grabher's 45.88%. For first serve returns, Okamura again leads with 34.08% over Grabher's 30.67%.
- Handling pressure: Okamura is a bit better at saving breakpoints, doing so 47.31% of the time over Grabher's 45.65%. Could this make a difference in critical moments?
- Overall match wins: Grabher holds a higher win percentage over the past year with 64.47%, while Okamura is at 55.7%.
- Surface strengths: Grabher excels on clay with a 65% win rate, whereas Okamura shines on grass with 64%. However, Okamura struggles more on clay, indicating potential vulnerability.
- Player level competition: Grabher faces tougher opponents with an average rank of 234.53, compared to Okamura’s average of 349.01, suggesting Grabher might be better prepared for higher-ranked competition.
- Deciding set capability: Okamura has the edge, winning 56% of deciding sets, compared to Grabher’s 47%.
- Breakpoint conversion: Okamura surpasses Grabher, converting 40.43% of opportunities compared to Grabher's 37.36%.
Editorial Prediction (May 30, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming match features two players with distinct strengths and weaknesses. Grabher's slight edge in recent second serve performance may provide an advantage, but Okamura's superior return game and breakpoint efficiency are compelling counterpoints.
Okamura's ability to perform under pressure, especially in high-stakes moments like saving breakpoints and converting them, offers a strategic advantage. Their notable skill in winning deciding sets could become critical if the match is closely contested.
While Grabher has faced tougher competition, showcasing resilience and adaptability, Okamura's grass court success and overall breakpoint conversion give them the edge.
Considering all factors, Okamura seems more likely to emerge victorious in this match, leveraging their strong return game and mental fortitude under pressure.
Grabher vs Okamura Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Julia Grabher Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Julia Grabher
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amarni Banks
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Julia Grabher
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Federica Urgesi
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
47
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Despina Papamichail
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Julia Grabher
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Caty McNally
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Kyoka Okamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Kyoka Okamura
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Kyoka Okamura
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
81 of
128)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
58 of
128)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Vitalia Diatchenko
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Kyoka Okamura
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Kyoka Okamura
81%
(
55 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Panna Udvardy
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
66%
(
73 of
110)
1st Serve %
76%
(
79 of
104)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
49 of
79)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
7-5 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (396/263) | Win/Loss | 54% (362/313) |
| 59% (876/617) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (830/738) |
| 54% (7280/6212) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (7320/7012) |
| 45% (30/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (269/231) |
| 65% (346/186) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (25/31) |
| 35% (19/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (50/39) |
| 17% (1/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (18/12) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 693 | Aces Total | 677 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2464 | Total Double Faults | 1593 |
| 1:21:51 | Average Match Time | 1:19:49 |
| 473.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 541.75 |
| 65% (23892/36955) | 1st Serve % | 63% (20848/33192) |
| 62% (14873/23892) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (12630/20848) |
| 45% (5824/13061) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5624/12342) |
| 49% (2386/4870) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1929/4089) |
| 47% (17616/37573) | Return Points Win % | 45% (15132/33714) |
| 36% (10/18) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 47% (8/9) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 34% (20/38) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (12/18) |
| 63% (255/150) | Challenger W/L | 53% (292/254) |
| 74% (96/33) | Futures W/L | 62% (58/36) |
| 60% (389/646) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (358/670) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 49% (64/130) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (57/124) |
| 53% (96/182) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (111/219) |
| 89% (386/345) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (362/305) |
| 10% (386/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (362/57) |
| 19% (273/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (313/56) |
Grabher vs. Okamura Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
