J. Grabher
To Win
A. Banks
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L L W W LForm
L W W L W W W W L LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Grabher winning 2 and Friedsam winning 1. The last match between Grabher and Friedsam was at the W100 Wiesbaden, 01-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Julia Grabher getting the victory 3-6 6-0 7-6(2).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Julia Grabher | 1 |
Anna-Lena Friedsam | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W100 Wiesbaden(01-05-2025)
Grabher | Stats | Friedsam |
---|---|---|
67% (32-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 74% (28-10) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
141 | Ranking | 232 |
54 | Highest Rank | 45 |
28 | Age | 31 |
- | Plays | R |
17 | Titles | 15 |
60% (396-261) | Career Total W/L | 60% (389-256) |
$402,254 | Career Prize Money | $1,078,782 |
3 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
23 Jun 2025 / First
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
25 Jun 2025 / Second
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-6 6-0 7-6(2) |
![]() ![]()
Julia Grabher
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
16 | Games Won | 12 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
2:24:54 | Average Match Time | 2:24:54 |
64% (50/78) | 1st Serve % | 67% (68/102) |
66% (33/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (40/68) |
57% (16/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (11/34) |
46% (6/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (4/12) |
50% (51/102) | Return Points Win % | 37% (29/78) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In recent months, Alexandra Friedsam has demonstrated a strong overall performance, winning 74.29% of her matches played, with a W/L record of 26/9. In contrast, Julia Grabher has secured victories in 63.64% of her matches, evidenced by a W/L record of 42/24. These statistics provide a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head comparison, offering predictions on match outcomes.
When examining second serve performance, Friedsam leads slightly, winning 40.54% of points, while Grabher has secured 38.13% of such points over the last six months. This metric is closely tied to match prediction accuracy and emphasizes Friedsam's slight edge in this area.
In recent form, Friedsam has shown greater efficiency in saving breakpoints, managing to save 53.79% compared to Grabher's 47.14%. This statistic holds significance for in-game betting predictions. On the return game front, Friedsam has won 46.79% of her opponent's second serve points, in contrast to Grabher's 45.67%. However, for first serve returns, the stats are more evenly matched, with Friedsam winning 28.52% and Grabher slightly ahead at 28.71%.
Considering surface preferences, Friedsam thrives on Indoor Hard courts, boasting a career win percentage of 67% (W/L 122/59), while Grass remains her least successful surface at 47% (W/L 16/18). On the other hand, Grabher excels on Clay with a 65% win rate (W/L 335/179), but struggles on Grass, holding just a 20% win percentage (W/L 1/4).
Analyzing their level of play, both competitors primarily participate in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K. Friedsam has won 76.67% of these matches (W/L 23/7), mirroring Grabher's 76.47% success rate (W/L 39/12). This comparison is pivotal in forecasting the favorite relative to the event level.
In matches requiring a deciding set, Friedsam emerges as the stronger contender, winning 64% of such sets over the past year, whereas Grabher has secured only 43% of these matches. This detail may prove useful for live predictions and betting markets.
While both players exhibit abilities worth noting, the slight edge in several key areas, particularly second serve power and deciding set performance, may tilt the balance in favor of Friedsam for the upcoming match. Taking into account all these comparative statistics, Friedsam appears to have a stronger case for a predicted victory in this match.
Grabher vs Friedsam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Barbora Palicova
Player
Julia Grabher
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Julia Grabher
Player
Federica Urgesi
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
47
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Julia Grabher
Player
Despina Papamichail
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ena Shibahara
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Kaja Juvan
Player
Julia Grabher
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Julia Grabher
Player
Caty McNally
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Julia Grabher
Player
Kyoka Okamura
81%
(
55 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Julia Grabher
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Alexis Blokhina
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
76%
(
78 of
103)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
107)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
41 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sofia Shapatava
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
8 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Joanna Garland
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sara Errani
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
88%
(
73 of
83)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-0 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60% (396/261) | Win/Loss | 60% (389/256) |
59% (875/613) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (874/626) |
54% (7262/6187) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7466/6457) |
45% (30/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (101/79) |
65% (346/185) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (137/92) |
35% (19/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (135/66) |
20% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (16/19) |
0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
689 | Aces Total | 1511 |
0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
2458 | Total Double Faults | 1620 |
1:21:51 | Average Match Time | 1:10:40 |
475 | Average Opponent Rank | 449.37 |
65% (23813/36828) | 1st Serve % | 65% (21595/33215) |
62% (14817/23813) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (14095/21595) |
45% (5801/13013) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5357/11618) |
49% (2383/4864) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1644/3622) |
47% (17571/37441) | Return Points Win % | 43% (14010/32822) |
37% (10/17) | Slam W/L | 38% (21/35) |
47% (8/9) | Masters W/L | 33% (10/20) |
32% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 40% (2/3) |
34% (20/38) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (101/90) |
63% (255/149) | Challenger W/L | 69% (204/93) |
74% (96/33) | Futures W/L | 77% (51/15) |
60% (389/644) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (380/631) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
49% (64/130) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (86/168) |
53% (96/181) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (119/220) |
89% (386/345) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (385/329) |
10% (386/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (385/55) |
20% (271/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (260/59) |