J. Grabher
To Win
A. Banks
To Win
Julia Grabher vs Anastasia Abbagnato Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L L W W L
Form
L L W L W L W L W LHead-2-Head: Grabher 1 - 0 Abbagnato
They have played 2 sets in total, with Grabher winning 2 and Abbagnato winning 0. The last match between Grabher and Abbagnato was at the Parma Ladies Open - Parma, 12-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Julia Grabher getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Julia Grabher | 1 |
| Anastasia Abbagnato | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Parma Ladies Open - Parma(12-05-2025)
Julia Grabher
Anastasia Abbagnato
6
4
6
4
| Grabher | Stats | Abbagnato |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (32-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (16-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 141 | Ranking | 498 |
| 54 | Highest Rank | 408 |
| 28 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 17 | Titles | 1 |
| 60% (396-261) | Career Total W/L | 51% (103-99) |
| $402,254 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Upcoming Match
- / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tomic VS Hijikata PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
24 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fearnley VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Julia Grabher
Player
Anastasia Abbagnato
84%
(
51 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:27:27 | Average Match Time | 1:27:27 |
| 84% (51/61) | 1st Serve % | 70% (42/60) |
| 78% (40/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (31/42) |
| 30% (3/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (10/18) |
| 67% (2/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 32% (19/60) | Return Points Win % | 30% (18/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Grabher vs Abbagnato Match Preview :
- Grabher's recent second serve performance shows a success rate of 37.41%, slightly lower than Abbagnato's 37.97%. Could this indicate an edge for Abbagnato? It's worth considering.
- Analyzing return game stats, Abbagnato tends to outperform with 48.43% win on opponent's second serve points compared to Grabher's 44.89%.
- First serve return stats also favor Abbagnato, who achieves success with 32.38% of points, above Grabher's 29.29%.
- Grabher exhibits better pressure-handling with 47.29% of breakpoints saved, overshadowing Abbagnato's 44.02%.
- Performance over the past year highlights Grabher's dominance with a 64.29% win rate versus Abbagnato's 50.85%.
- Grabher excels on clay with a career win rate of 65%, whereas Abbagnato thrives on hard surfaces with a 61% win rate.
- At the Challenger/ITF level, Grabher shows superior performance, winning 76.36% of matches, while Abbagnato stands at 50.98%.
- Grabher consistently faces tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 301.29, in contrast to Abbagnato's 485.64.
- In deciding sets, both players have an equal 50% success rate in the past year.
- Recent form indicates Grabher is more effective at converting breakpoints at 36.24% compared to Abbagnato's 30.77%.
Editorial Prediction (May 12, 2025, UTC):
In examining the head-to-head statistics, Abbagnato displays a slight advantage in both second serve and return game performance, showcasing proficiency in capturing points off the opponent's serve.
Grabher, however, excels under pressure and has shown a dominant overall performance in the last year, indicating strong match fitness and adaptability, especially on clay, which might pose a challenge for Abbagnato.
Considering the competition level faced, the quality of opponents, and her superior breakpoint conversion, Grabher seems to be in a better position to clinch the upcoming match.
Given these factors, Grabher appears to have the edge and is likely to win this upcoming tennis match.
Grabher vs Abbagnato Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Julia Grabher Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Julia Grabher
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Federica Urgesi
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
47
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Despina Papamichail
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Julia Grabher
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Caty McNally
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Kyoka Okamura
81%
(
55 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Anastasia Abbagnato Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Anastasia Abbagnato
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Abbagnato
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Anastasia Abbagnato
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Abbagnato
Player
Michelle Dzjachangirova
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
49%
(
18 of
37)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Samson
Player
Anastasia Abbagnato
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Abbagnato
Player
Carolina Kuhl
57%
(
59 of
103)
1st Serve %
72%
(
82 of
114)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
50 of
82)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
48 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
114)
109
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karolina Vlckova
Player
Anastasia Abbagnato
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
55
Total Points Won
50
|
1-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (396/261) | Win/Loss | 51% (103/99) |
| 59% (875/613) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (234/226) |
| 54% (7262/6187) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (2129/2095) |
| 45% (30/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (22/14) |
| 65% (346/185) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (60/66) |
| 35% (19/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (21/18) |
| 20% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 689 | Aces Total | 373 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 2458 | Total Double Faults | 421 |
| 1:21:51 | Average Match Time | 1:32:35 |
| 475 | Average Opponent Rank | 457.53 |
| 65% (23813/36828) | 1st Serve % | 61% (7164/11827) |
| 62% (14817/23813) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (4430/7164) |
| 45% (5801/13013) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2116/4663) |
| 49% (2383/4864) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (657/1446) |
| 47% (17571/37441) | Return Points Win % | 45% (5365/12006) |
| 37% (10/17) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (8/9) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 32% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 34% (20/38) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (255/149) | Challenger W/L | 49% (65/68) |
| 74% (96/33) | Futures W/L | 57% (38/29) |
| 60% (389/644) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (102/201) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (64/130) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (22/39) |
| 53% (96/181) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (28/57) |
| 89% (386/345) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (112/91) |
| 10% (386/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (112/21) |
| 20% (271/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (90/12) |
Grabher vs. Abbagnato Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
