Julia Grabher vs Amarni Banks Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W W L L L
Form
W W L L W W L L W LHead To Head: Grabher 0 - 1 Banks
They have played 3 sets in total, with Grabher winning 1 and Banks winning 2. The last match between Grabher and Banks was at the Wimbledon - London, 24-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Amarni Banks getting the victory 6-4 1-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Julia Grabher | 0 |
| Amarni Banks | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(24-06-2025)
Amarni Banks
Julia Grabher
6
4
1
6
6
3
| Grabher | Stats | Banks |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (32-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (15-10) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 139 | Ranking | 270 |
| 54 | Highest Rank | 235 |
| 29 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 17 | Titles | 2 |
| 60% (396-263) | Career Total W/L | 61% (123-78) |
| $402,254 | Career Prize Money | $41,500 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Anisimova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 1-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Amarni Banks
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 13 | Games Won | 13 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:37:0 | Average Match Time | 1:37:0 |
| 57% (42/74) | 1st Serve % | 71% (55/77) |
| 76% (32/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (44/55) |
| 59% (19/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (8/22) |
| 67% (2/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 32% (25/77) | Return Points Win % | 31% (23/74) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Grabher vs Banks Match Preview :
- In the last six months, Banks' second serve performance is slightly stronger, winning 42.31% of points compared to Grabher's 39.63%. Does this suggest a service advantage for Banks? Yes, it could be a deciding factor in their favor.
- Examining recent return game stats, Banks has outperformed Grabher, claiming 50.29% of opponent's second serve points versus 46.83% by Grabher. Who is more consistent in return games? Banks has the upper hand here.
- In first serve returns, Banks marginally leads by winning 32.67%, while Grabher stands at 31.66%. Is there a significant difference? Not much, but it subtly favors Banks in return proficiency.
- When facing break points, Banks shows resilience, saving 49.69% compared to Grabher's 44.69%. This could make Banks more formidable under pressure situations.
- Overall match performance over the previous year favors Grabher slightly, with a match win rate of 63.86%, while Banks holds 61.11%. Does prior success indicate the potential winner? Possibly, but it's a tight contest.
- Playing surface preferences differ; Grabher excels on Clay (65% win rate), whereas Banks shines on Hard courts (64%). How might this influence the match? Surface compatibility could influence performance significantly.
- At the Challenger/ITF level, Grabher displays stronger performance, winning 74.63% of these matches compared to Banks' 62%. Could experience at this level play a role? Yes, it might give Grabher a slight experiential edge.
- The caliber of opponents has been somewhat stronger for Grabher in the last year, with competitors averaging a rank of 292.49, compared to Banks' 308.02. Does tougher past competition prepare Grabher better? Potentially, it could enhance performance under pressure.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Banks has a slight edge, winning 48% of these compared to Grabher's 47%. Who is marginally better in clutch situations? Banks appears slightly more adept.
- In terms of break point conversion, Banks again leads with a 41.74% success rate, contrasting with Grabher's 35.81%. Is Banks more opportunistic with break points? It seems so, adding to their potential advantage.
Editorial Prediction (June 24, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent stats, Banks holds slight advantages in several key areas, including second serve performance, returns, and break point conversions. These suggest that Banks could have a more consistent game plan during this match.
However, while both players show competitive performance over the past year, Grabher's slightly higher overall win rate and experience at the Challenger/ITF level hint at their potential to overcome challenging scenarios.
Taking into account these factors, although the match appears closely contested, Banks is likely to edge out as the winner based on current form and tactical advantages.
Grabher vs Banks Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Julia Grabher Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Julia Grabher
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amarni Banks
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Julia Grabher
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Federica Urgesi
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
47
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Despina Papamichail
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Julia Grabher
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Caty McNally
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Amarni Banks Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Amarni Banks
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amarni Banks
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Amarni Banks
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
4
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
4
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Amarni Banks
49%
(
49 of
100)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
6
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
8
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amarni Banks
Player
Mingge Xu
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amarni Banks
Player
Olivia Gadecki
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
37%
(
39 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Amarni Banks
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Eva Guerrero Alvarez
Player
Amarni Banks
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (396/263) | Win/Loss | 61% (123/78) |
| 59% (876/617) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (277/185) |
| 54% (7280/6212) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2289/1967) |
| 45% (30/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (78/44) |
| 65% (346/186) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 35% (19/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (38/24) |
| 17% (1/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 44% (7/9) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 693 | Aces Total | 600 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 2464 | Total Double Faults | 557 |
| 1:21:51 | Average Match Time | 1:29:32 |
| 473.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 414.21 |
| 65% (23892/36955) | 1st Serve % | 66% (7897/11979) |
| 62% (14873/23892) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (5132/7897) |
| 45% (5824/13061) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1945/4081) |
| 49% (2386/4870) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (645/1373) |
| 47% (17616/37573) | Return Points Win % | 44% (5203/11856) |
| 36% (10/18) | Slam W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 47% (8/9) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 34% (20/38) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 63% (255/150) | Challenger W/L | 63% (98/57) |
| 74% (96/33) | Futures W/L | 59% (22/15) |
| 60% (389/646) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (121/198) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (64/130) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (18/30) |
| 53% (96/182) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (29/61) |
| 89% (386/345) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (123/105) |
| 10% (386/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (123/18) |
| 19% (273/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (78/18) |
Grabher vs. Banks Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
