Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julia Boserup vs Richel Hogenkamp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Boserup vs Hogenkamp analysis and find out who is favored!
Julia Boserup vs Richel Hogenkamp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Boserup has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hogenkamp has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Boserup, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hogenkamp has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Boserup has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hogenkamp has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Boserup has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Hogenkamp winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Boserup has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 16/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 16/ 20). Hogenkamp has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 215/ 132), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 14/ 19).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Boserup winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Boserup winning 2 and Hogenkamp winning 0. The last match between Boserup and Hogenkamp was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 09-03-2015, Q1 round, Hard with Julia Boserup getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Boserup and Hogenkamp have played a deciding set 0 times, with Boserup winning 0 times and Hogenkamp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Boserup winning 1, and Hogenkamp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Boserup has played against opponents with an average rank of while Hogenkamp has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Boserup has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hogenkamp has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Boserup has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hogenkamp has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Boserup 1 - 0 Hogenkamp
Ret.
Rank
80
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
896
Rank
94
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
48% (175-188)
Career Total W/L
59% (414-282)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$277,140
Career Prize Money
$542,444
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Julia Boserup | Richel Hogenkamp |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:13 | 1:48:13 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (55/84) | 53% (39/74) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (33/55) | 62% (24/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (15/29) | 43% (15/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (5/5) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (35/74) | 43% (36/84) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Julia Boserup
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julia Boserup | Richel Hogenkamp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Julia Boserup Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Naomi Broady
Player
Julia Boserup
40%
(
39 of
97)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
106)
20
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
9
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
46 of
77)
43%
(
25 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Ingrid Neel
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
10
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Misaki Doi
Player
Julia Boserup
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yanina Wickmayer
Player
Julia Boserup
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Maria Mateas
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
31%
(
10 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Elitsa Kostova
71%
(
82 of
115)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
1
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
0
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
45%
(
52 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Julia Boserup
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Jovana Jovic
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(7) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Gibbs
Player
Julia Boserup
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
5
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Julia Boserup
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Richel Hogenkamp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuki Naito
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
31 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Christina Rosca
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Salma Djoubri
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Boserup Vs Hogenkamp Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
