Julia Boserup vs Jorgelina Cravero Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W L L W L
Form
L L W L L W W W W WH2H: Boserup 1 - 0 Cravero
They have played 3 sets in total, with Boserup winning 2 and Cravero winning 1. The last match between Boserup and Cravero was at the Kansas City, 04-10-2010, First, Hard with Julia Boserup getting the victory 6-1 4-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Julia Boserup | 1 |
| Jorgelina Cravero | 0 |
Kansas City(04-10-2010)
6
1
4
6
6
1
| Boserup | Stats | Cravero |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 80 | Highest Rank | 106 |
| 33 | Age | 43 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 10 |
| 48% (175-188) | Career Total W/L | 57% (203-154) |
| $277,140 | Career Prize Money | $69,100 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pegula VS Eala PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Berrettini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 4-6 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Julia Boserup Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Naomi Broady
Player
Julia Boserup
40%
(
39 of
97)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
106)
20
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
9
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
46 of
77)
43%
(
25 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Ingrid Neel
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
10
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Misaki Doi
Player
Julia Boserup
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yanina Wickmayer
Player
Julia Boserup
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Maria Mateas
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
31%
(
10 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Elitsa Kostova
71%
(
82 of
115)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
1
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
0
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
45%
(
52 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Julia Boserup
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Jovana Jovic
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(7) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Gibbs
Player
Julia Boserup
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
5
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Julia Boserup
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jorgelina Cravero Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| F | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 0-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48% (175/188) | Win/Loss | 57% (203/154) |
| 49% (405/416) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (458/363) |
| 50% (3707/3696) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3945/3505) |
| 48% (105/114) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (76/63) |
| 46% (32/37) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (121/81) |
| 49% (22/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 22% (2/7) |
| 53% (16/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 284 | Aces Total | 33 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 920 | Total Double Faults | 165 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 570.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 526.82 |
| 64% (7243/11261) | 1st Serve % | 63% (1304/2056) |
| 61% (4454/7243) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (737/1304) |
| 40% (1626/4018) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (298/752) |
| 44% (591/1344) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (139/270) |
| 43% (4827/11108) | Return Points Win % | 48% (974/2030) |
| 47% (15/17) | Slam W/L | 50% (13/13) |
| 30% (6/14) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 44% (26/33) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (21/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (127/122) | Challenger W/L | 54% (122/102) |
| 33% (1/2) | Futures W/L | 79% (45/12) |
| 48% (174/359) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (199/350) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 48% (36/75) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (32/65) |
| 43% (43/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (56/109) |
| 82% (192/158) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (196/170) |
| 17% (192/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (196/26) |
| 10% (171/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (160/33) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
