Recent Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Avdeeva has displayed a second serve success rate of 43.64%, while Bandecchi has excelled with a 50.73% rate. It is worth noting that there exists a strong correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.

Return Game Performance: Analyzing return game statistics, it becomes evident that Avdeeva, in recent form, has triumphed in 52.28% of her opponents' second serve points. On the other hand, Bandecchi has been slightly more dominant, claiming 53.79% of these points. Turning attention to first serve returns, Avdeeva tallies a success rate of 31.57%, whereas Bandecchi boasts an impressive 39.44%. These numbers undoubtedly bear significance in determining the favored player in this head-to-head match.

Thriving Under Pressure: When faced with breakpoints, Avdeeva has proven her composure by saving 64% of them in recent matches. In contrast, Bandecchi has shown slightly less prowess, saving 60.26% of breakpoints. This statistic can prove invaluable when predicting betting outcomes during crucial points in the game.

Comprehensive Performance Overview: In the last year, Avdeeva has emerged victorious in 53.97% of her matches (winning 34 out of 63), while Bandecchi has exhibited even greater success with a win rate of 65.71% (triumphing in 46 out of 70 matches). These numbers contribute to the overall prediction and prognosis of this highly anticipated encounter.

Surface Superiority: Avdeeva has showcased her utmost prowess on clay courts, boasting a remarkable 62% win rate (emerging victorious in 102 out of 164 matches). Conversely, her performance on grass courts has been less favorable, coinciding with a 0% win rate (failing to win any out of the sole match played). Conversely, Bandecchi has achieved her highest success rate on indoor hard courts, recording a formidable 62% win rate (triumphing in 55 out of 89 matches). However, her performance on grass courts mirrors Avdeeva's somewhat, with a 53% win rate (gaining victory in 9 out of 17 matches).

Player Level: Over the past year, Avdeeva has predominantly participated in Challenger/ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10K. Throughout these competitions, she has secured victory in 54.9% of her matches (winning 28 out of 51). Similarly, Bandecchi has primarily competed in the same tier of tournaments, achieving an impressive triumph rate of 68.66% (emerging victorious in 46 out of 67 matches). It is crucial to consider the level of events each player has been engaged in when assessing and predicting their respective chances of success.

Head-to-Head Encounters: Avdeeva and Bandecchi have met on two occasions previously, with Avdeeva failing to secure a victory and Bandecchi triumphing twice. These encounters have spanned across five sets, resulting in Avdeeva winning one set and Bandecchi claiming four. Most recently, their clash took place at the W75 Ismaning tournament on November 7, 2024, on a carpet court where Susan Bandecchi emerged victorious by securing a hard-fought victory with a scoreline of 4-6, 7-6(5), 6-4.

Average Match Duration: Historical evidence reveals that these players have, on average, contested matches lasting 1 hour, 38 minutes, and 30 seconds.

Outcome in Deciding Sets: Throughout their rivalry, Avdeeva and Bandecchi have encountered a deciding set once. Avdeeva has been unsuccessful in this scenario, failing to secure a victory, while Bandecchi boasts one triumph. These statistics hold significance in predicting the outcome if this current match extends to a deciding set.

Extreme Pressure Situations: In their competitive encounters, these players have participated in one tiebreak, with Avdeeva failing to emerge victorious and Bandecchi securing the win.

Opponent Quality: Over the past twelve months, Avdeeva has frequently faced opponents with an average ranking of 244.27, whereas Bandecchi's opponents boasted a slightly higher average rank of 298.3. These statistics shed light on the level of competition each player has faced and must be considered when making predictions.

Performance in Deciding Sets Against All Players: In matches reaching a deciding set over the past year, Avdeeva has successfully triumphed in 59% of such encounters. Bandecchi, on the other hand, has displayed slightly better results, winning 64% of matches in which a deciding set was required. These figures provide valuable insights for live predictions and betting scenarios.

Current Event Statistics: While historical player performance undoubtedly aids in predicting tennis match outcomes, it is equally important to assess current event statistics to gauge the form of players within the ongoing tournament. To access these specific details, please refer to the section below, highlighting their performances in the current event. It is imperative to acknowledge that certain players demonstrate particularly strong performances at specific tournaments, and such factors should be considered when determining the final outcome.

Break Point Conversion: In recent matches, Avdeeva has capitalized on 45.06% of her breakpoint opportunities, while Bandecchi has converted 44.85% of her chances to break her opponents' serves. Such figures bear tremendous significance in in-game live betting, particularly when either player approaches a breakpoint opportunity.

If you are interested in exploring models that accurately predict tennis match outcomes, the following article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: Strictly for statistical enthusiasts).