K. Hobgarski
To Win
J. Adams
To Win
Julia Adams vs Chelsea Fontenel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L W L W W W
Form
L L L W W L W W L LHead-2-Head: Adams 1 - 0 Fontenel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Adams winning 2 and Fontenel winning 0. The last match between Adams and Fontenel was at the W50 Bujumbura, 25-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Julia Adams getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Julia Adams | 1 |
| Chelsea Fontenel | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Bujumbura(25-03-2025)
Julia Adams
Chelsea Fontenel
6
2
7
5
| Adams | Stats | Fontenel |
|---|---|---|
| 66% (31-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 45% (9-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 554 | Ranking | 829 |
| 554 | Highest Rank | 746 |
| 25 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 67% (88-43) | Career Total W/L | 45% (45-55) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
22 May 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Hurkacz PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Arnaldi VS Djokovic PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Julia Adams
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:24:15 | Average Match Time | 1:24:15 |
| 58% (31/53) | 1st Serve % | 63% (40/63) |
| 77% (24/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (23/40) |
| 55% (12/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (6/23) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 54% (34/63) | Return Points Win % | 32% (17/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Adams vs Fontenel Match Preview :
When scrutinizing the recent second serve performances over the past six months, can Fontenel find a way to outperform Adams? Fontenel has secured 37.4% of their second serve points, marginally trailing behind Adams' 37.85%. This delicate difference can often sway the outcome of the match, particularly in close encounters.
Diving deeper into recent return game statistics, Fontenel has demonstrated strength with a 48.68% success rate on opponents' second serve points, while Adams edges them out slightly with 48.84%. Notably, the first serve return stats reveal that Adams excels with a 33.6% win rate compared to Fontenel's 31.39%. In the heat of a head-to-head matchup, Adams' prowess in this area cannot be ignored.
How does each player handle pressure situations like saving breakpoints? Adams shows a greater resilience with a success rate of 49.3%, just eclipsing Fontenel's 48.82%. This slight difference could provide valuable insights for those placing in-game bets, reflecting Adams’ slight edge in high-stakes moments.
In evaluating overall performances, Adams boasts a significantly higher win percentage over the last year, clinching 67.78% of their matches compared to Fontenel's 44.12%. This broader performance overview begins to paint a picture of who may hold the upper hand. Moreover, when considering surface specialization, Fontenel shines on hard courts with a 48% win rate while Adams excels even more dramatically on indoor hard courts at 71%.
As for the level of competition, the tournaments they frequent highlight key differences, with Adams competing and thriving more in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tier, winning 70% of such matches, overshadowing Fontenel's 45.16% in the Challengers/ITF circuit. Furthermore, Adams' competition averages a ranking of 320.07, considerably higher than Fontenel's 432.85, suggesting Adams faces consistently tougher opponents.
If the match stretches to a deciding set, statistics indicate Adams has a minor edge, winning 43% of such sets compared to Fontenel's 40% over the last year. In the realm of break point conversion, however, Fontenel takes the lead with a 41.94% success rate, overshadowing Adams' 38.16%. This statistic suggests that Fontenel can be a force to reckon with when seizing opportunities at crucial junctures.
While both players bring unique strengths to the match, the cumulative analysis of recent performances, competition level, and surface preferences suggests that Adams is the predicted favorite to emerge victorious in this contest.
Adams vs Fontenel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Julia Adams Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Adams
Player
Carolina Kuhl
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Adams
Player
Alexandra Vasilyeva
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
31 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
61
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 1-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yuliana Lizarazo
Player
Julia Adams
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Adams
Player
Isabell Ek
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniela Piani
Player
Julia Adams
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
51
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Jokic
Player
Julia Adams
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Chelsea Fontenel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sarafina Olivia Hansen
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
49
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 4-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alba Rey Garcia
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Lucia Llinares Domingo
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Primorac
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
78%
(
63 of
81)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Yuliana Lizarazo
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Alice Robbe
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
2
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (88/43) | Win/Loss | 45% (45/55) |
| 65% (194/104) | Sets Win/Loss | 45% (104/125) |
| 56% (1558/1219) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (1057/1111) |
| 69% (68/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (21/23) |
| 58% (15/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 42% (15/21) |
| 71% (5/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (9/11) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 236 | Aces Total | 149 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 309 | Total Double Faults | 208 |
| 1:19:18 | Average Match Time | 1:23:3 |
| 341.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 481.07 |
| 65% (4413/6779) | 1st Serve % | 65% (3374/5170) |
| 62% (2749/4413) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1989/3374) |
| 46% (1085/2366) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (766/1795) |
| 50% (432/869) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (272/620) |
| 48% (3140/6585) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2296/5195) |
| 58% (22/16) | Challenger W/L | 44% (35/45) |
| 71% (66/27) | Futures W/L | 50% (10/10) |
| 67% (88/131) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (44/98) |
| 50% (10/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (10/16) |
| 50% (18/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (16/31) |
| 93% (83/77) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (43/37) |
| 7% (83/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (43/5) |
| 23% (48/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (57/7) |
Adams vs. Fontenel Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
