Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jule Niemeier vs Jamie Loeb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Niemeier vs Loeb analysis and find out who is favored!
Jule Niemeier vs Jamie Loeb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Niemeier has won 41.54% of points on his second serve, while Loeb has won 47.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Niemeier, in recent form, has won 57.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Loeb has won 55.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.47% and 38.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Niemeier has saved 53.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Loeb has saved 54.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Niemeier has won 50.85% of matches played (W/L 30/ 29), with Loeb winning 50% (W/L 30/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Niemeier has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 115/ 60), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 32/ 37). Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Niemeier has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 56% of matches (W/L 14/ 11), where as Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.88% of matches (W/L 29/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Niemeier winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Niemeier winning 2 and Loeb winning 0. The last match between Niemeier and Loeb was at the W25 Prerov, 22-09-2020, First, Clay with Jule Niemeier getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Niemeier and Loeb have played a deciding set 0 times, with Niemeier winning 0 times and Loeb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Niemeier winning 0, and Loeb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Niemeier has played against opponents with an average rank of 211.56 while Loeb has played against players with an average rank of 289.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Niemeier has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Loeb has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Niemeier has converted 47.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Loeb has converted 47.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Niemeier 1 - 0 Loeb
109
Rank
61
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
295
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
60% (191-129)
Career Total W/L
55% (294-242)
61% (17-11)
YTD W/L
61% (14-9)
$1,005,523
Career Prize Money
$219,866
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jule Niemeier | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:0 | 1:28:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (36/64) | 49% (21/43) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (24/36) | 48% (10/21) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (15/28) | 41% (9/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (24/43) | 39% (25/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Jule Niemeier
Player
Jamie Loeb
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jule Niemeier | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (17/11) | 61% (14/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (38/28) | 59% (32/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (326/299) | 55% (272/222) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 65% (13/7) | 80% (8/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 63% (5/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (3/1) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 65 | 73 |
| DFs per game | 0.63 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 192 | 70 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:28 | 1:42:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 192.43 | 344.04 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (1142/2050) | 55% (855/1546) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (746/1142) | 68% (579/855) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (386/908) | 50% (343/690) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (126/263) | 48% (93/195) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (984/2092) | 45% (725/1594) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (7/5) | 61% (14/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (17/28) | 64% (14/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 20% (10/2) |
Jule Niemeier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Jule Niemeier
74%
(
78 of
105)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
45 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Jule Niemeier
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
41%
(
29 of
71)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
13
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nuria Brancaccio
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Jule Niemeier
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Storm Hunter
Player
Jule Niemeier
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Jule Niemeier
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Varvara Gracheva
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Claire Liu
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Natalija Stevanovic
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
4
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
27%
(
10 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
54%
(
49 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
58 of
110)
100
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Akasha Urhobo
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Kolie Allen
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Bronte Murgett
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valeria Savinykh
Player
Jamie Loeb
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Jamie Loeb
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Niemeier Vs Loeb Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
