Juan Sebastian Gomez vs Tyler Zink Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gomez vs Zink analysis and find out who is favored!
Juan Sebastian Gomez vs Tyler Zink Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gomez has won 41.38% of points on his second serve, while Zink has won 44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gomez, in recent form, has won 65% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zink has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.5% and 31.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gomez has saved 40% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zink has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gomez has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 9/ 12), with Zink winning 28.57% (W/L 4/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gomez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 118/ 77), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Zink has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 24/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Gomez has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 6/ 6), where as Zink has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 3/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gomez winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gomez winning 2 and Zink winning 0. The last match between Gomez and Zink was at the M15 Cancun, 12-05-2022, Second, Hard with Juan Sebastian Gomez getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gomez and Zink have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gomez winning 0 times and Zink 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gomez winning 0, and Zink 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gomez has played against opponents with an average rank of 197.24 while Zink has played against players with an average rank of 265.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gomez has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zink has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gomez has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zink has converted 16.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gomez 1 - 0 Zink
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
898
Rank
469
High
32
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
874
Rank
781
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (299-227)
Career Total W/L
44% (33-42)
50% (2-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Juan Sebastian Gomez | Tyler Zink |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
1st Serve % | 77% (46/60) | 59% (40/68) |
1st Serve Win% | 63% (29/46) | 65% (26/40) |
2nd Serve Win% | 64% (9/14) | 36% (10/28) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 17% (1/6) |
Return Points W% | 47% (32/68) | 37% (22/60) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
Juan Sebastian Gomez
Player
Tyler Zink
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Juan Sebastian Gomez | Tyler Zink |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (45/44) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.07 | 0 |
Aces Total | 3 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
DFs Total | 10 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (70/128) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 57% (40/70) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 41% (24/58) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (9/21) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 49% (72/148) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Juan Sebastian Gomez Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Juan Sebastian Gomez
Player
Preston Brown
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Arthur Bonnaud
Player
Juan Sebastian Gomez
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 5-7 10-6 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Karue Sell
Player
Juan Sebastian Gomez
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Juan Sebastian Gomez
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
10 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gilbert Klier Junior
Player
Juan Sebastian Gomez
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marcelo Zormann
Player
Juan Sebastian Gomez
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
109)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
109)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Juan Sebastian Gomez
Player
Mateus Alves
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Juan Sebastian Gomez
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H |
view more
Tyler Zink Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Learner Tien
Player
Tyler Zink
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Keegan Smith
Player
Tyler Zink
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
106)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
21 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
19
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
William Grant
Player
Tyler Zink
51%
(
39 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Tyler Zink
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-0 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alfredo Perez
Player
Tyler Zink
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Goncalo Oliveira
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Brandon Walkin
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
38
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Szymon Kielan
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more