Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Juan Pablo Paz vs Nerman Fatic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paz vs Fatic analysis and find out who is favored!
Juan Pablo Paz vs Nerman Fatic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paz has won 46.74% of points on his second serve, while Fatic has won 47.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paz, in recent form, has won 49.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fatic has won 46.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.93% and 36.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paz has saved 50.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fatic has saved 56.99% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paz has won 55.07% of matches played (W/L 38/ 31), with Fatic winning 53.62% (W/L 37/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 439/ 298), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 279/ 189), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Paz has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.26% of matches (W/L 33/ 20), where as Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Paz winning 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Paz winning 3 and Fatic winning 4. The last match between Paz and Fatic was at the M15 Porec, 12-03-2020, Second, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paz and Fatic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Paz winning 0 times and Fatic 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paz winning 0, and Fatic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paz has played against opponents with an average rank of 319.57 while Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 273.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paz has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fatic has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paz has converted 41.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fatic has converted 40.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paz 1 - 2 Fatic
569
Rank
284
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard0
1
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
212
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
59% (448-316)
Career Total W/L
57% (339-252)
44% (7-9)
YTD W/L
40% (6-9)
$2,105
Career Prize Money
$73,995
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Juan Pablo Paz | Nerman Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 4 |
| Games Won | 28 | 33 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:0 | 1:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (111/181) | 63% (75/120) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (61/111) | 59% (44/75) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (38/70) | 44% (20/45) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 79% (11/14) | 29% (9/31) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (56/120) | 45% (82/181) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Nerman Fatic
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Nerman Fatic
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Juan Pablo Paz | Nerman Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (7/9) | 40% (6/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (18/18) | 43% (15/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (168/171) | 46% (150/179) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (7/9) | 25% (2/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 70 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:29 | 1:33:7 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 243.69 | 343.87 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (633/985) | 62% (574/926) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (405/633) | 68% (393/574) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (174/352) | 47% (167/352) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (44/102) | 33% (27/81) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (416/1038) | 37% (360/982) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 30% (3/7) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 40% (6/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/5) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 64% (11/7) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 36% (11/4) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Juan Pablo Paz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
45%
(
50 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Boris Kozlov
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Yshai Oliel
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Mohamed Safwat
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
16 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Paz Vs Fatic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Juan Pablo Paz
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
