Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Juan Pablo Paz vs Ivan Gakhov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paz vs Gakhov analysis and find out who is favored!
Juan Pablo Paz vs Ivan Gakhov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paz has won 48.28% of points on his second serve, while Gakhov has won 46.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paz, in recent form, has won 50.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gakhov has won 49.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.68% and 28.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paz has saved 52.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gakhov has saved 65.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paz has won 54.41% of matches played (W/L 37/ 31), with Gakhov winning 40.38% (W/L 21/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 439/ 299), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Gakhov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 402/ 230), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Paz has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 32/ 20), where as Gakhov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45% of matches (W/L 18/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Paz winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Paz winning 2 and Gakhov winning 2. The last match between Paz and Gakhov was at the M15 Cairo, 20-01-2021, First, Clay with Juan Pablo Paz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paz and Gakhov have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paz winning 0 times and Gakhov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paz winning 1, and Gakhov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paz has played against opponents with an average rank of 317.76 while Gakhov has played against players with an average rank of 272.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paz has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gakhov has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paz has converted 41.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gakhov has converted 43.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paz 1 - 1 Gakhov
587
Rank
284
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
272
Rank
142
High
27
Age
L
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
59% (448-317)
Career Total W/L
61% (464-295)
41% (7-10)
YTD W/L
38% (8-13)
$2,105
Career Prize Money
$56,825
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Juan Pablo Paz | Ivan Gakhov |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 21 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:51 | 1:32:51 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (83/139) | 70% (83/118) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (47/83) | 63% (52/83) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (29/56) | 54% (19/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 30% (6/20) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (47/118) | 45% (63/139) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-1 |
Stats 
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Ivan Gakhov
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
54
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Juan Pablo Paz | Ivan Gakhov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 41% (7/10) | 38% (8/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (18/20) | 45% (21/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (176/183) | 49% (231/239) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 41% (7/10) | 41% (7/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 37 | 100 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 76 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:42 | 1:49:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 251.29 | 252.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (707/1110) | 59% (931/1578) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (457/707) | 70% (652/931) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (199/403) | 46% (300/647) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (49/113) | 44% (54/123) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (466/1164) | 38% (566/1501) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 38% (6/10) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (6/16) | 40% (8/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 14% (1/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/5) | 17% (1/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 64% (11/7) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 36% (11/4) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (11/0) |
Juan Pablo Paz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Petr Brunclik
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
45%
(
50 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Boris Kozlov
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Yshai Oliel
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Ivan Gakhov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Henri Squire
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alexander Weis
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Ivan Gakhov
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Ivan Gakhov
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Paz Vs Gakhov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ivan Gakhov
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
