R. C. Subervi
To Win
B. Kuzuhara
To Win
Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Roberto Cid Subervi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W L L L L
Form
W W W L W L W L W WHead-2-Head: Ficovich 4 - 0 Subervi
They have played 9 sets in total, with Ficovich winning 8 and Subervi winning 1. The last match between Ficovich and Subervi was at the San Luis Potosi Challenger, 17-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Juan Pablo Ficovich getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Juan Pablo Ficovich | 4 |
| Roberto Cid Subervi | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: San Luis Potosi Challenger(17-04-2025)
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Roberto Cid Subervi
6
3
6
4
| Ficovich | Stats | Subervi |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (21-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (11-6) |
| 4 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 154 | Ranking | 428 |
| 125 | Highest Rank | 211 |
| 28 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 13 | Titles | 14 |
| 57% (399-307) | Career Total W/L | 58% (314-224) |
| $322,630 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 3 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Eala VS Arango PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zeppieri VS Gomez PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
23 May 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 5-7 6-4 6-0 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
49%
(
44 of
90)
1st Serve %
48%
(
42 of
88)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(6) |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 8 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 54 | Games Won | 34 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:46:13 | Average Match Time | 1:46:13 |
| 59% (156/266) | 1st Serve % | 58% (165/284) |
| 77% (120/156) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (98/165) |
| 55% (61/110) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (57/119) |
| 50% (16/32) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (7/18) |
| 45% (129/284) | Return Points Win % | 32% (85/266) |
| 100% (4/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ficovich vs Subervi Match Preview :
When evaluating tennis matches, a key indicator of future performance is the second serve. In the last six months, Juan Pablo Ficovich has demonstrated an edge by winning 45.59% of his second serve points, whereas Nick Hardt Subervi trails behind with 37.53%. Given the historical significance of this statistic, this could offer valuable hints about who may come out on top.
The story continues with return game statistics. Ficovich has managed to capture 46.51% of opponent second serve points, slightly outpacing Subervi, who has secured 45.28%. Interestingly, when it comes to first serve returns, Subervi holds a slight advantage, securing 30.05% of those points compared to Ficovich’s 26.35%. This fine margin could influence who is favored in this head-to-head encounter.
When the pressure mounts, how do these players perform? Ficovich shines by saving 52.86% of breakpoints he faces, while Subervi has only saved 46.32%. Such mental toughness in high-stakes situations often becomes crucial in determining match outcomes.
In terms of their past year's performances, it's Subervi who boasts a higher win percentage, clinching victory in 66.67% of his matches (34 wins to 17 losses), compared to Ficovich’s 57.83% (48 wins to 35 losses). If win rates paint a picture of potential match outcomes, Ficovich might be more familiar with tackling tougher competition. Over the last 12 months, his opponents have averaged a rank of 248.72, whereas Subervi has faced players with an average rank of 172.94.
Surface preference can also be an intriguing factor. Ficovich performs best on clay with a 60% win rate, whereas Subervi excels on hard courts, winning 61% of his matches. However, on the grass, both players underperform, with Ficovich winning only 20% and Subervi yet to secure a victory.
Recent head-to-head statistics present a definitive narrative—Ficovich leads with a perfect 3-0 record over Subervi, winning 6 out of their 7 sets. Their latest clash at the M25 Trujillo on clay strengthened Ficovich’s dominance with a 6-2, 6-4 victory. This provides a compelling case for Ficovich when considering their upcoming battle.
Deciding set performance hints at both players' tenacity. Ficovich has won 57% of deciding sets in the last year, slightly more than Subervi's 53%. Even during intense pressure situations, such as tiebreaks, Ficovich prevails, having won the only tiebreak they played against each other. Breakpoint conversion rates add another layer to the prediction puzzle, with Subervi converting 45.68% of opportunities compared to Ficovich’s 33.5%.
Taking into account recent form, surface preferences, and head-to-head history, Ficovich seems poised to maintain his unbeaten streak against Subervi yet again. His consistent record against Subervi and resilience under pressure makes him the favorite for the upcoming match.
Ficovich vs Subervi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Juan Pablo Ficovich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cristian Garin
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Miguel Tobon
50%
(
14 of
28)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Maxime Janvier
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
11
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alfredo Perez
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Roberto Cid Subervi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Gavin Goode
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
12
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
2
94%
(
32 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Cannon Kingsley
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Jodar
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Garrett Johns
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (399/307) | Win/Loss | 58% (314/224) |
| 55% (903/732) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (708/549) |
| 52% (8063/7427) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6124/5415) |
| 47% (42/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (138/88) |
| 59% (348/238) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (162/116) |
| 31% (8/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (14/19) |
| 20% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 2050 | Aces Total | 854 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1228 | Total Double Faults | 1428 |
| 1:28:47 | Average Match Time | 1:26:47 |
| 452.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 498 |
| 62% (25927/42043) | 1st Serve % | 61% (18025/29429) |
| 68% (17596/25927) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (11897/18025) |
| 51% (8215/16116) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5494/11404) |
| 41% (1839/4433) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1636/3515) |
| 41% (17394/42891) | Return Points Win % | 44% (13102/29857) |
| 35% (7/13) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/7) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 27% (4/11) |
| 45% (9/11) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 51% (176/168) | Challenger W/L | 42% (83/113) |
| 64% (206/114) | Futures W/L | 71% (227/91) |
| 56% (393/699) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (306/523) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 48% (98/206) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (62/136) |
| 52% (117/227) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (98/179) |
| 84% (396/334) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (297/252) |
| 16% (396/62) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (297/44) |
| 20% (309/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (241/61) |
Ficovich vs. Subervi Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
