J. M. Cerundolo
To Win
L. V. Assche
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W W L LForm
L L W W W W L W W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Cerundolo winning 2 and Cina winning 0. The last match between Cerundolo and Cina was at the Turin Challenger, 13-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Juan Manuel Cerundolo getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Juan Manuel Cerundolo | 1 |
Federico Cina | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Turin Challenger(13-05-2025)
Cerundolo | Stats | Cina |
---|---|---|
61% (27-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (17-8) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
107 | Ranking | 279 |
79 | Highest Rank | 279 |
23 | Age | 18 |
L | Plays | - |
14 | Titles | 2 |
62% (274-170) | Career Total W/L | 59% (50-35) |
$565,595 | Career Prize Money | $35,260 |
0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(3) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Federico Cina
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 10 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:55:46 | Average Match Time | 1:55:46 |
51% (38/74) | 1st Serve % | 61% (50/82) |
71% (27/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (28/50) |
47% (17/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (17/32) |
33% (4/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
45% (37/82) | Return Points Win % | 41% (30/74) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The statistical analysis favors Cerundolo in several key areas: second serve performance, breakpoint conversion, and overall match win percentage in the past year. These factors suggest a consistent and reliable performance under pressure.
Although Cina has a higher win percentage in lower-tier tournaments, Cerundolo’s exposure to higher-ranked opponents in more competitive environments gives him an experience edge. This is crucial when facing stronger opponents.
Given the slight advantages in both serving and returning, along with the ability to save breakpoints and perform well in deciding sets, Cerundolo appears to have a stronger case for victory in the upcoming match.
Based on these insights, Cerundolo is most likely to win this tennis match.
Cerundolo vs Cina Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
8
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
105)
4
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Alex Michelsen
44%
(
35 of
79)
1st Serve %
72%
(
64 of
89)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Hady Habib
63%
(
66 of
104)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Gauthier Onclin
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Federico Cina
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Federico Cina
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
33 of
69)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Cina
Player
Emilio Nava
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Cina
Player
Hynek Barton
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Federico Cina
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
32 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Federico Cina
Player
Charles Broom
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
109)
10
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Federico Cina
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
7
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Cina
Player
Ilya Snitari
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Cina
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (274/170) | Win/Loss | 59% (50/35) |
59% (609/421) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (109/79) |
53% (5015/4482) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (947/867) |
36% (9/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (33/19) |
64% (265/146) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (17/16) |
0% (0/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
693 | Aces Total | 213 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
996 | Total Double Faults | 220 |
1:39:30 | Average Match Time | 1:41:5 |
325.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 367.46 |
67% (19516/29268) | 1st Serve % | 61% (3486/5719) |
63% (12269/19516) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2386/3486) |
50% (4874/9751) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1131/2233) |
47% (1555/3333) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (257/614) |
43% (12810/29662) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2418/5906) |
45% (10/12) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
63% (10/6) | Masters W/L | 40% (2/3) |
51% (34/33) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
65% (146/80) | Challenger W/L | 52% (16/15) |
65% (74/39) | Futures W/L | 65% (32/17) |
64% (268/420) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (49/83) |
21% (4/19) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
68% (77/114) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 73% (24/33) |
61% (76/125) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (10/20) |
88% (265/233) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (51/44) |
12% (265/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (51/7) |
23% (179/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (34/6) |