J. C. P. Angelo
To Win
M. Jones
To Win
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo vs Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L W L W
Form
L W W W W L W L W LHead-2-Head: Angelo 3 - 1 Ambrogi
They have played 8 sets in total, with Angelo winning 6 and Ambrogi winning 2. The last match between Angelo and Ambrogi was at the Porto Alegre Challenger, 29-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Juan Carlos Prado Angelo getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Juan Carlos Prado Angelo | 3 |
| Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Porto Alegre Challenger(29-04-2025)
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
6
4
6
2
| Angelo | Stats | Ambrogi |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (16-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (23-16) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 314 | Ranking | 346 |
| 274 | Highest Rank | 346 |
| 20 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 2 |
| 60% (95-64) | Career Total W/L | 61% (139-89) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 3 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
25 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
Upcoming Match
24 Jun 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Fonseca PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
25 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Marino VS Knutson PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 42 | Games Won | 30 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:29:17 | Average Match Time | 1:29:17 |
| 62% (123/198) | 1st Serve % | 66% (159/242) |
| 71% (87/123) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (101/159) |
| 60% (45/75) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (37/83) |
| 43% (12/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (6/9) |
| 43% (104/242) | Return Points Win % | 33% (66/198) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Angelo vs Ambrogi Match Preview :
Within the past six months, Angelo has demonstrated strong second serve performance, securing 40.86% of points, slightly trailing behind Ambrogi's 42.68%. Additionally, Angelo has displayed remarkable skill in return games, winning 48.43% of his opponent's second serve points, compared to Ambrogi's 43.35%. It is notable that there is a distinct correlation between these stats and the accuracy of match predictions.
The pressure analysis highlights Angelo's ability to save 47.74% of breakpoints in recent performances. However, Ambrogi edges out with a slightly superior breakpoint save rate of 53.16%. This factor provides valuable insight for in-game betting, especially under high-pressure scenarios. Meanwhile, when it comes to converting breakpoint opportunities, Angelo performs well with a 36.53% conversion rate, compared to Ambrogi's 30.29%.
In terms of adaptability to different surfaces, Angelo thrives on hard courts with a 64% career win rate, while performing less impressively on indoor hard courts with a 33% win percentage. Ambrogi, meanwhile, excels on clay with a 62% win rate but struggles on hard courts, winning only 20% of matches. This information could prove instrumental when anticipating performance relative to surface type.
Comparatively, over the last year, Angelo has won 60.29% of his matches (41 wins out of 68), closely rivaled by Ambrogi, who boasts a slightly higher win rate of 62.03% (49 wins out of 79). They both primarily compete at the Challengers/ITF level tournaments, with Ambrogi having a marginal edge, winning 57.89% compared to Angelo’s 52.94%.
In direct head-to-head encounters, Angelo has a slight advantage, having beaten Ambrogi in 2 of their 3 matchups. Notably, Angelo won their most recent clash in a clay court tournament with a decisive 6-3, 6-1 victory. Throughout their meetings, the average match duration has stretched to 1:28:20, yet they have never contended in a deciding set or tiebreak, highlighting potential matches under extreme pressure.
Examining their matches over the last year, Angelo has faced opponents ranked on average at 328.13, while Ambrogi's adversaries had a slightly higher average rank of 363.16. This disparity in opponent quality might favor Angelo strategically. Moreover, if the fixture extends into a deciding set, Angelo has an imposing 69% win ratio over the past year, whereas Ambrogi holds a 50% success rate, establishing Angelo as a stronger contender in elongated matches.
Given these statistical insights and performance patterns, Angelo appears to be the likely victor in this matchup based on his superior record in crucial scenarios, recent head-to-head advantage, and stronger surface preferences.
Angelo vs Ambrogi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Christopher Li
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
75%
(
59 of
79)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Roncadelli
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
72%
(
89 of
124)
1st Serve %
61%
(
86 of
141)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
68 of
141)
137
Total Points Won
128
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Gonzalo Bueno
75%
(
79 of
106)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
106)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
80)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
115
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Gray Voelzke
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Patricio Alvarado
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
51%
(
61 of
119)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
47%
(
27 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
41%
(
49 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
112)
121
Total Points Won
110
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Arklon Huertas Del Pino
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
90 of
135)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
49 of
90)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
64 of
135)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Player
Thiago Cigarran
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Player
Aryan Shah
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Player
Enzo Kohlmann De Freitas
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Player
Nicolas Bruna
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (95/64) | Win/Loss | 61% (139/89) |
| 55% (210/169) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (310/215) |
| 52% (1841/1671) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2673/2296) |
| 65% (11/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) |
| 60% (83/56) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (138/85) |
| 33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 305 | Aces Total | 401 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 358 | Total Double Faults | 437 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:45:19 |
| 367.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 392.13 |
| 58% (6358/10990) | 1st Serve % | 66% (9574/14424) |
| 65% (4136/6358) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (6238/9574) |
| 50% (2325/4632) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2364/4850) |
| 45% (600/1330) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (731/1574) |
| 44% (4929/11272) | Return Points Win % | 43% (6094/14234) |
| 52% (44/41) | Challenger W/L | 51% (36/35) |
| 69% (51/23) | Futures W/L | 66% (103/54) |
| 59% (93/157) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (138/227) |
| 50% (20/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (35/63) |
| 65% (41/63) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (37/70) |
| 90% (91/82) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (130/118) |
| 10% (91/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (130/12) |
| 19% (68/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (98/20) |
Angelo vs. Ambrogi Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
