M. Kobori
To Win
L. Rioux
To Win
Josy Daems vs Lisa-Marie Rioux Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W L W W L
Form
W W L W L L W L W WHead-to-head: Daems 1 - 0 Rioux
They have played 2 sets in total, with Daems winning 2 and Rioux winning 0. The last match between Daems and Rioux was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Josy Daems getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-3.
W15 Sharm ElSheikh(19-02-2025)
7
6
6
3
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tomova VS McNally PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Arnaldi VS Wu PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats 
Josy Daems
Player
Lisa-Marie Rioux
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
13
Games Won
9
0
Aces (Total)
0
1
Total Double Faults
4
2:10:50
Average Match Time
2:10:50
78% (46/59)
1st Serve %
63% (43/68)
65% (30/46)
1st Serve Win %
53% (23/43)
54% (7/13)
2nd Serve Win %
56% (14/25)
44% (4/9)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (2/4)
46% (31/68)
Return Points Win %
37% (22/59)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Josy Daems vs Lisa-Marie Rioux Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Josy Daems 1 - 0 Lisa-Marie Rioux
- Analysis of Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Daems and Rioux have demonstrated varying levels of success on their second serves. Daems has achieved a commendable 42.68% points won, whereas Rioux has managed to attain 47.62%. It is noteworthy that there exists a notable correlation between these statistics and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Evaluation of Return Game Statistics: Recent return game statistics highlight Daems' formidable prowess. The player has triumphed in an impressive 59.8% of their opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Rioux has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 58.28%. Comparable attributes persist for first serve returns, with respective percentages of 40.48% and 41.04%. This information proves influential in distinguishing the favored player for their upcoming head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Assessments: Delving into the pressure-filled moments of recent matches, Daems has adeptly saved 56.97% of breakpoints, while Rioux has demonstrated a marginally lower capability of saving 55.93%. These figures offer insight into potential betting predictions during in-game scenarios.
- Performance Overview: In the past year, Daems has displayed a commendable performance, winning 58.54% of their matches (W/L 24/17). Rioux, while slightly behind, has also exhibited notable skill, securing victory in 55.26% of their matches (W/L 21/17). These statistics provide a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head prediction.
- Optimum Surface Selection: When considering Daems' career win percentages on different court surfaces, it becomes apparent that their most favorable surface is Hard, where they achieve an impressive 61% win rate (W/L 14/9). However, their performance dwindles on Clay, with a comparatively lower success rate of 45% (W/L 10/12). In contrast, Rioux excels on I.hard courts, securing an impressive 58% win rate (W/L 7/5). Conversely, Rioux's performance on Clay courts diminishes slightly, with a win rate of 48% (W/L 14/15).
- Player Level Assessment: Comparing the levels at which Daems and Rioux have competed in the past year, Daems has predominantly participated in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K tier, amassing victories in an impressive 64.71% of matches (W/L 22/12). Rioux, on the other hand, has primarily engaged in the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, achieving victory in 60% of matches played (W/L 12/8). Consequently, when evaluating statistics to predict the favored player, it is crucial to consider the relative event level at which they have been competing.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the course of the last 12 months, Daems has frequently encountered opponents with an average rank of 402.51. In contrast, Rioux has faced players with a marginally higher average rank of 481.53. These figures shed light on the caliber of adversaries each player has encountered.
- Deciding Set Performance versus All Players: For those intrigued by live predictions and betting strategies, an examination of the players' performances in deciding sets can prove invaluable. Daems has demonstrated remarkable proficiency, emerging victorious in 82% of deciding sets played within the past 12 months. Rioux, while still competent, has achieved a comparatively lower win rate of 38% in all matches on the tour.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: Although observing previous player performances yields valuable insights for predicting tennis outcomes, once an event commences, it is imperative to analyze current event statistics for indications of in-form players. Interested individuals are advised to refer to the section below to examine the players' performance within the ongoing event. Additionally, it is important to note that certain players exhibit enhanced performances at specific events, which should be duly considered when making predictions.
- Break Point Conversion: Analyzing recent performances, Daems has effectively converted 48.13% of breakpoint opportunities, while Rioux has exhibited a slightly lower conversion rate of 47.54% when attempting to break their opponents' serves. These statistics serve as essential indicators for in-game live betting enthusiasts during moments where either player possesses a breakpoint opportunity.
- For those seeking models that accurately predict tennis matches, this article serves as an insightful starting point. (Warning: Recommended for statistical enthusiasts only)
Josy Daems Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Podrez
Player
Josy Daems
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Josy Daems
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Josy Daems
Player
Matylda Burylo
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
92%
(
36 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
42
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristiana Sidorova
Player
Josy Daems
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
74%
(
79 of
107)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
97
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Josy Daems
Player
Lisa-Marie Rioux
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Josy Daems
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Josy Daems
Player
Laura Rahnel
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
9
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
49%
(
36 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Josy Daems
Player
Noemi Maines
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
48%
(
23 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
45
Total Points Won
43
|
1-6 6-0 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Lisa-Marie Rioux Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lisa-Marie Rioux
Player
Seri Nayuki
75%
(
62 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
40 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Akiko Omae
Player
Lisa-Marie Rioux
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
81%
(
42 of
52)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lisa-Marie Rioux
Player
Natsumi Shioya
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Josy Daems
Player
Lisa-Marie Rioux
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Lisa-Marie Rioux
82%
(
62 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(4) 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Paris Corley
Player
Lisa-Marie Rioux
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa-Marie Rioux
Player
Humera Baharmus
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
2-6 6-0 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lisa-Marie Rioux
Player
Pawinee Ruamrak
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
54% (33/28)
Win/Loss
55% (117/95)
51% (73/71)
Sets Win/Loss
56% (264/206)
50% (669/666)
Games Win/Loss
53% (2274/1989)
60% (15/10)
Hard Win/Loss
58% (82/60)
45% (10/12)
Clay Win/Loss
48% (14/15)
57% (8/6)
Indoor Hard W/L
48% (13/14)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
57% (8/6)
0.09
Aces Per Game
0.03
57
Aces Total
62
0.27
Double Faults Per Game
0.17
177
Total Double Faults
348
1:43:31
Average Match Time
1:10:58
431.56
Average Opponent Rank
520.45
65% (2484/3835)
1st Serve %
69% (5974/8703)
59% (1476/2484)
1st Serve Win %
56% (3365/5974)
46% (616/1351)
2nd Serve Win %
45% (1230/2729)
47% (223/472)
Break Points Won % (Total)
48% (584/1218)
45% (1706/3791)
Return Points Win %
48% (4202/8689)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
30% (3/7)
Challenger W/L
56% (68/53)
59% (30/21)
Futures W/L
54% (49/42)
54% (33/61)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
54% (111/206)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (3/3)
73% (8/11)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
59% (19/32)
68% (15/22)
Deciding Set Win %
28% (13/47)
96% (26/25)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (126/107)
4% (26/1)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (126/19)
23% (35/8)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
11% (85/9)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
