Josy Daems vs Julia Middendorf Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Daems 1 - 0 Middendorf

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daems has won 42.94% of points on their second serve, while Middendorf has won 41.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daems, in recent form, has won 54.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Middendorf has won 52.81%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.31% and 39.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Daems has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Middendorf has saved 53.99% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Daems has won 41.18% of matches played (W/L 7/ 10), with Middendorf winning 49.09% (W/L 27/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Daems has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Middendorf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 11/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
• Player level: In the last year, Daems has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 6/ 7), where as Middendorf has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.94% of matches (W/L 23/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Daems winning 1 times and Middendorf being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Daems winning 2 and Middendorf winning 0. The last match between Daems and Middendorf was at the W35 Erwitte, 14-08-2024, First, Clay with Josy Daems getting the victory 6-2 4-1 ret..
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Daems and Middendorf have played a deciding set 0 times, with Daems winning 0 times and Middendorf 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Daems winning 0, and Middendorf 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daems has played against opponents with an average rank of 373.82 while Middendorf has played against players with an average rank of 340.35.
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daems has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Middendorf has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Daems has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Middendorf has converted 45.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
• If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)