Josy Daems vs Carlota Martinez Cirez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Jun at 11:39 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Daems vs C. Martinez Cirez

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Daems 1 - 0 Cirez
They have played 3 sets in total, with Josy Daems winning 2 and Carlota Martinez Cirez winning 1. The last match between Josy Daems and Carlota Martinez Cirez was at the W50 Troisdorf, 05-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Josy Daems getting the victory 6-3 5-7 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daems | 1 |
| Cirez | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W50 Troisdorf(06-05-25)
J. Daems vs C. M. Cirez H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $11,820 |
| 55.77% (58-46) | Career Total W/L | 58.60% (235-166) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 7 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-2) |
J. Daems vs C. M. Cirez Match Preview:
- Cirez's second serve success rate in the past six months is 35.35%, compared to Daems' 39.15%. Does this suggest an edge for Daems in serve reliability? It might.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Cirez has performed slightly better, winning 53.31% of points compared to Daems' 51.37%.
- For first serve returns, Cirez secures 38.25% of points, while Daems has a lower percentage at 34.51%.
- Under pressure, Daems saves 50.89% of break points, outpacing Cirez, who saves 44.79%.
- In the last year, Cirez achieved a 61.8% win rate, slightly higher than Daems' 58.49%.
- Cirez excels on clay courts with a 62% win rate, whereas Daems favors hard courts with a 59% win rate.
- Recent data shows Cirez participates mostly in higher-level Challenger/ITF events, winning 63.22%, whereas Daems competes mainly in $10K ITF tournaments, boasting a 64.29% win rate.
- Opponents faced by Cirez have a slightly better average ranking (436.03) compared to those faced by Daems (446.23).
- In deciding set scenarios, Daems wins 69% of the time, which is quite superior to Cirez's 53% success rate.
- Cirez has been more effective at converting break points, with a 50.29% success rate versus Daems' 40.29%.
Editorial Prediction (June 5, 2025, UTC):
Cirez and Daems both bring distinct strengths to their upcoming match, making it a highly anticipated encounter. Cirez demonstrates a stronger ability in returning serves and converting break points, which could prove vital in seizing match-winning opportunities.
Daems, however, exhibits a more consistent performance under pressure, saving break points at a higher rate and excelling in deciding sets. This resilience could be critical, particularly in crucial moments of the match.
The choice of surface may also play a significant role. While Cirez is more adept on clay, Daems has a solid record on hard courts, suggesting that each player's performance could fluctuate based on the playing conditions.
Assessing all factors, Cirez's composite advantages on serve returns and break point conversions, paired with their slightly superior win rate at higher-level tournaments, makes them the likely favorite to secure a win in this matchup.
Josy Daems vs Carlota Martinez Cirez Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Daems vs C. M. Cirez H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 14 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:46:43 | Average Match Time | 2:46:43 |
| 66% (66/100) | 1st Serve % | 68% (69/102) |
| 64% (42/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (37/69) |
| 35% (12/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (16/33) |
| 64% (7/11) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (6/16) |
| 48% (49/102) | Return Points Win % | 46% (46/100) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Daems Recent Matches Played
C. M. Cirez Recent Matches Played

J. Daems vs C. M. Cirez Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.77% (58/46) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.60% (235/166) |
| 52.54% (124/112) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.70% (521/382) |
| 50.78% (1109/1075) | Games Win/Loss | 53.35% (4297/3758) |
| 62.16% (23/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.28% (14/15) |
| 48.98% (24/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (219/146) |
| 61.11% (11/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 86 | Aces Total | 158 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 282 | Total Double Faults | 1337 |
| 1:40:14 | Average Match Time | 1:41:11 |
| 468.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 465.35 |
| 65% (4119/6304) | 1st Serve % | 65% (15558/23836) |
| 58% (2406/4119) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (8956/15558) |
| 46% (1016/2185) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (3586/8278) |
| 47% (383/817) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (1782/3383) |
| 46% (2899/6288) | Return Points Win % | 50% (11818/23862) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 50.00% (20/20) | Challenger W/L | 57.77% (171/125) |
| 59.38% (38/26) | Futures W/L | 67.74% (63/30) |
| 55% (57/103) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (231/394) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 70% (14/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (31/53) |
| 69% (20/29) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (53/106) |
| 96% (50/48) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (232/202) |
| 4% (50/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (232/30) |
| 19% (54/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (169/32) |