L. Mikrut
To Win
J. Simundza
To Win
Josip Simundza vs Alessandro Battiston Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L W L W W
Form
L W L W L L L W L LH2H: Simundza 1 - 0 Battiston
They have played 3 sets in total, with Simundza winning 2 and Battiston winning 1. The last match between Simundza and Battiston was at the M15 Antalya, 19-02-2025, First, Clay with Josip Simundza getting the victory 7-6(2) 4-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Josip Simundza | 1 |
| Alessandro Battiston | 0 |
M15 Antalya(19-02-2025)
7
6
4
6
6
4
| Simundza | Stats | Battiston |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (11-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 29% (2-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 887 | Ranking | N/A |
| 887 | Highest Rank | |
| 20 | Age | 18 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 48% (61-66) | Career Total W/L | 30% (7-16) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pegula VS Eala PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
27 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Josip Simundza
Player
Alessandro Battiston
69%
(
68 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
81 of
115)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 16 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:42:9 | Average Match Time | 2:42:9 |
| 69% (68/99) | 1st Serve % | 70% (81/115) |
| 71% (48/68) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (49/81) |
| 35% (11/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (15/34) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
| 44% (51/115) | Return Points Win % | 40% (40/99) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Josip Simundza vs Alessandro Battiston Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Josip Simundza 1 - 0 Alessandro Battiston
According to recent statistics, Simundza has shown a superior performance in their second serve, winning 48.41% of points, while Battiston has only managed to win 39.25%. The correlation between this stat and the accuracy of match predictions is quite significant.
An analysis of return game stats reveals that Simundza has been more successful in recent form, winning 48.35% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Battiston has achieved a higher success rate of 59.2%. The same pattern is observed for first serve returns, with Simundza winning 29.12% and Battiston winning 38.68%. These return stats have a strong correlation with determining the favorite in their head-to-head matchup.
Examining their performance under pressure, Simundza has saved 58.87% of breakpoints in recent matches, while Battiston has saved 56.58%. This statistic proves useful when making predictions for in-game betting.
In terms of overall performance, Simundza has won 50.98% of matches played in the past year (26 wins and 25 losses), while Battiston's record stands at 36.36% (4 wins and 7 losses). Considering their head-to-head history, this provides a comprehensive prediction overview.
When it comes to preferred surfaces, Simundza has found considerable success on clay courts, winning 47% of matches (46 wins and 51 losses). However, their performance on indoor hard courts has been weaker, winning only 33% (1 win and 2 losses). In comparison, Battiston excels on clay courts with a 40% win rate (6 wins and 9 losses), but struggles on hard courts, winning 0% (0 wins and 2 losses).
In terms of player level, Simundza has primarily competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K over the past year, winning 54.17% of matches (26 wins and 22 losses). Battiston has also participated in these tournaments, but with a lower success rate of 40% (4 wins and 6 losses). It is important to consider the event level when analyzing player stats to predict the favorite.
In terms of opponent quality, Simundza has faced players with an average rank of 355.04 over the past 12 months, while Battiston has played against opponents with an average rank of 338.55.
When it comes to deciding sets, Simundza has an impressive record of winning 72% of these sets in the past year. In contrast, Battiston has yet to win a deciding set in any of their matches on the tour.
While past player performance is valuable for predictions, it is also crucial to consider the current event stats to gauge player form. For more detailed information on current event stats, refer to the section below. Additionally, certain players may have a stronger affinity for specific events, which should be taken into account when predicting the outcome.
Another important statistic to note is the break point conversion rate. Simundza has successfully converted 36.56% of breakpoint opportunities, while Battiston has a higher conversion rate of 47.69% in breaking their opponents' serves. This information is particularly relevant for in-game live betting tips when either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in predictive models for tennis matches, an article that might catch your attention provides a good starting point. (Warning: Reserved for avid statistics enthusiasts).
Josip Simundza Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Josip Simundza
Player
Gergely Madarasz
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
79%
(
64 of
81)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Josip Simundza
Player
Savva Rybkin
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
63 of
111)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
111)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Josip Simundza
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Josip Simundza
Player
Marco Cecchinato
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
74%
(
76 of
103)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Josip Simundza
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
53%
(
52 of
98)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
36%
(
35 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Josip Simundza
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-0 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Josip Simundza
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 7-5 15-13 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 3-6 10-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Alessandro Battiston Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
John Hallquist Lithen
Player
Alessandro Battiston
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gergely Madarasz
Player
Alessandro Battiston
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Battiston
Player
Jeremy Gschwendtner
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gian Marco Ortenzi
Player
Alessandro Battiston
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Josip Simundza
Player
Alessandro Battiston
69%
(
68 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
81 of
115)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dusan Obradovic
Player
Alessandro Battiston
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Battiston
Player
Saba George Nanobashvili
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Alessandro Battiston
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Battiston
Player
Stijn Slump
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
13
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Alessandro Battiston
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48% (61/66) | Win/Loss | 30% (7/16) |
| 47% (135/154) | Sets Win/Loss | 35% (17/32) |
| 48% (1358/1455) | Games Win/Loss | 46% (208/243) |
| 47% (7/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 49% (53/56) | Clay Win/Loss | 35% (7/13) |
| 33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 257 | Aces Total | 43 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 254 | Total Double Faults | 85 |
| 1:11:59 | Average Match Time | 1:11:17 |
| 288.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 305.43 |
| 57% (3331/5892) | 1st Serve % | 60% (610/1009) |
| 66% (2200/3331) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (376/610) |
| 47% (1208/2561) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (161/399) |
| 38% (197/518) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (53/118) |
| 38% (2115/5581) | Return Points Win % | 43% (441/1019) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 14% (1/6) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (60/60) | Futures W/L | 32% (7/15) |
| 47% (59/125) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 30% (7/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (15/22) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
| 59% (22/37) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 83% (60/50) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (8/7) |
| 17% (60/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (8/1) |
| 15% (67/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (15/0) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Josip Simundza
View full predicted draw for Simundza
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
