Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Joshua Peck vs Connor Farren Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peck vs Farren analysis and find out who is favored!
Joshua Peck vs Connor Farren Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peck has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Farren has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peck, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Farren has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peck has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Farren has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peck has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Farren winning 44.44% (W/L 4/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peck has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 12/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 18% (W/L 3/ 14). Farren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 191/ 191), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Peck winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Peck winning 0 and Farren winning 4. The last match between Peck and Farren was at the M25 Decatur, 03-08-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Connor Farren getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:49:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Peck and Farren have played a deciding set 0 times, with Peck winning 0 times and Farren 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Peck winning 0, and Farren 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peck has played against opponents with an average rank of while Farren has played against players with an average rank of 183.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peck has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Farren has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peck has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Farren has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Peck 0 - 2 Farren
Ret.
Rank
577
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
894
Rank
685
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
47% (43-49)
Career Total W/L
48% (200-214)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Joshua Peck | Connor Farren |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 13 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:49:30 | 0:49:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (39/62) | 69% (40/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (24/39) | 68% (27/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (8/23) | 44% (8/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 27% (3/11) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (23/58) | 48% (30/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
| 7-6(6) 3-0 ret. |
Stats 
Connor Farren
Player
Joshua Peck
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Joshua Peck | Connor Farren |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Joshua Peck Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Simeunovic
Player
Joshua Peck
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
14
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
32%
(
12 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
49%
(
43 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shunsuke Mitsui
Player
Joshua Peck
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
26%
(
7 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
0-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adit Sinha
Player
Joshua Peck
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
9
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Joshua Peck
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Peck
Player
Luis Britto
53%
(
47 of
88)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
5
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
5
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
46 of
72)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Drew Baird
Player
Joshua Peck
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
20 of
62)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fausto Tabacco
Player
Joshua Peck
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Connor Farren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Connor Farren
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Alexander Kotzen
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Braden Shick
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaimee Floyd Angele
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Rudy Quan
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Connor Farren
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
13
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Ivar Aramburu Contreras
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Connor Farren
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
A.j. Catanzariti
Player
Connor Farren
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
4
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Peck Vs Farren Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
