Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Joshua Goodger vs Martim LEOTE Prata Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Goodger vs Prata analysis and find out who is favored!
Joshua Goodger vs Martim LEOTE Prata Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Goodger has won 45.15% of points on his second serve, while Prata has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Goodger, in recent form, has won 49.13% of his opponent's second serve points, while Prata has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.93% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Goodger has saved 57.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Prata has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Goodger has won 37.5% of matches played (W/L 12/ 20), with Prata winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Goodger has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12). Prata has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Goodger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20), where as Prata has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Goodger has played against opponents with an average rank of 223.03 while Prata has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Goodger has won 27% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Prata has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Goodger has converted 34.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Prata has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Goodger 0 - 0 Prata
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Joshua Goodger | Martim LEOTE Prata |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 36% (5/9) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (77/83) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 17 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 10 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:40 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 187.33 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (283/436) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (192/283) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (71/153) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (11/24) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (135/381) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 33% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (2/6) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 1st Match |
Joshua Goodger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Joshua Goodger
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Goodger
Player
Demetris Azoides
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miljan Zekic
Player
Joshua Goodger
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Loxley
Player
Joshua Goodger
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
43 of
53)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 7-6(3) 11-9 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Joshua Goodger
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joshua Goodger
Player
David Quayle
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 7-6(2) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Demetris Azoides
Player
Joshua Goodger
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Goodger
Player
Simon Anthony Ivanov
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petros Chrysochos
Player
Joshua Goodger
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Joshua Goodger
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
13
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
40 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
11 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(12) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Martim LEOTE Prata Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-7(5) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Martim Leote Prata
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianni Ross
Player
Martim Leote Prata
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 1-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Martim Leote Prata
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martim Leote Prata
Player
Duarte Vale
59%
(
77 of
130)
1st Serve %
54%
(
65 of
120)
7
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
11
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
50 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
133
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Goodger Vs Prata Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
