Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jose Statham vs Naoki Nakagawa Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Statham vs Nakagawa analysis and find out who is favored!
Jose Statham vs Naoki Nakagawa Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Statham has won 51.77% of points on his second serve, while Nakagawa has won 50.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Statham, in recent form, has won 53.44% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nakagawa has won 45.32%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.48% and 31.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Statham has saved 57.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakagawa has saved 61.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Statham has won 38.64% of matches played (W/L 17/ 27), with Nakagawa winning 63.83% (W/L 30/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Statham has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 19/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6). Nakagawa has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 175/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 8/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Statham has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.84% of matches (W/L 14/ 24), where as Nakagawa has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.13% of matches (W/L 25/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Statham winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Statham winning 4 and Nakagawa winning 3. The last match between Statham and Nakagawa was at the Salinas Challenger, 04-04-2022, Q3, Hard with Naoki Nakagawa getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:5.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Statham and Nakagawa have played a deciding set 1 times, with Statham winning 1 times and Nakagawa 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Statham winning 0, and Nakagawa 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Statham has played against opponents with an average rank of 336.59 while Nakagawa has played against players with an average rank of 197.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Statham has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakagawa has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Statham has converted 46.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakagawa has converted 48.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Statham 2 - 1 Nakagawa
663
Rank
279
High
36
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
431
Rank
334
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
57% (604-453)
Career Total W/L
61% (295-192)
44% (4-5)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$33,515
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jose Statham | Naoki Nakagawa |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 38 | 30 |
| Aces (Total) | 21 | 19 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:5 | 1:48:5 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (147/220) | 54% (107/197) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (109/147) | 75% (80/107) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (39/73) | 57% (51/90) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (6/18) | 27% (3/11) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (66/197) | 33% (72/220) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Jose Statham
43%
(
23 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
32 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jose Statham | Naoki Nakagawa |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (4/5) | 25% (1/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 40% (4/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (112/112) | 48% (45/48) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 43 | 18 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:52 | 1:52:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 296.22 | 112.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (374/646) | 52% (154/295) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (261/374) | 70% (108/154) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (144/272) | 48% (67/141) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (20/41) | 39% (11/28) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (225/622) | 37% (110/294) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (4/9) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Jose Statham Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Jose Statham
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
12
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
52
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Jose Statham
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
6
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Jose Statham
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Sinclair
Player
Jose Statham
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
13
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
11
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
110)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Masamichi Imamura
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Toshihide Matsui
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Villanueva
Player
Jose Statham
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Naoki Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
128)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
128)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(4) 5-7 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
10
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
24 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
82
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
50%
(
52 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Statham Vs Nakagawa Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
