Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros vs Franco Emanuel Egea Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Herreros vs Egea analysis and find out who is favored!
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros vs Franco Emanuel Egea Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Herreros has won 29.17% of points on his second serve, while Egea has won 45.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Herreros, in recent form, has won 64.29% of his opponent's second serve points, while Egea has won 48.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.61% and 42.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Herreros has saved 44.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Egea has saved 52.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Herreros has won 36.36% of matches played (W/L 8/ 14), with Egea winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Herreros has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 143/ 89), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 113/ 124). Egea has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 194/ 152), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 35/ 33).
- Player level: In the last year, Herreros has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 5/ 10), where as Egea has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 9/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Herreros winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Herreros winning 1 and Egea winning 2. The last match between Herreros and Egea was at the Buenos Aires 2 Challenger, 25-04-2022, Q3, Clay with Franco Emanuel Egea getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:40:47.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Herreros and Egea have played a deciding set 1 times, with Herreros winning 0 times and Egea 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Herreros winning 1, and Egea 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Herreros has played against opponents with an average rank of 222.14 while Egea has played against players with an average rank of 175.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Herreros has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Egea has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Herreros has converted 16.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Egea has converted 47.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Herreros 0 - 1 Egea
885
Rank
447
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
900
Rank
566
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
55% (259-216)
Career Total W/L
55% (229-185)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jorge Brian Panta Herreros | Franco Emanuel Egea |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 10 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:40:47 | 2:40:47 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (43/88) | 65% (73/112) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (27/43) | 63% (46/73) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (19/45) | 56% (22/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 18% (2/11) | 75% (6/8) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (44/112) | 48% (42/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(6) 6-0 |
Stats 
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jorge Brian Panta Herreros | Franco Emanuel Egea |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (38/47) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:31:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 238 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (166/278) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (100/166) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (52/112) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 48% (12/25) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (115/274) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
15
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
1
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gonzalo Villanueva
Player
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Jeison Ticona
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
69%
(
92 of
133)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
57 of
92)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
47 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
61 of
133)
126
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Conner Huertas Del Pino
Player
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Kousuke Ogura
49%
(
40 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arklon Huertas Del Pino
Player
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Franco Emanuel Egea Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tobias Franco
Player
Franco Emanuel Egea
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Figl
Player
Franco Emanuel Egea
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
1-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Franco Emanuel Egea
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
2
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
2
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
49 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Franco Emanuel Egea
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Valerio Aboian
61%
(
68 of
111)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
42 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Alan Postay
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
43 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
115)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
70%
(
84 of
120)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
50 of
84)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
120)
113
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Fermin Tenti
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Herreros Vs Egea Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
