Jordi Samper-Montana vs Gavin Van Peperzeel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Samper-Montana vs Peperzeel analysis and find out who is favored!
Jordi Samper-Montana vs Gavin Van Peperzeel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Samper-Montana has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Peperzeel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Samper-Montana, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Peperzeel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Samper-Montana has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peperzeel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Samper-Montana has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Peperzeel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Samper-Montana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 69/ 51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Peperzeel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 114/ 68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Samper-Montana winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Samper-Montana winning 2 and Peperzeel winning 0. The last match between Samper-Montana and Peperzeel was at the Australia F3 (Canberra), 24-03-2017, Quarterfinals, Clay with Jordi Samper-Montana getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Samper-Montana and Peperzeel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Samper-Montana winning 0 times and Peperzeel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Samper-Montana winning 0, and Peperzeel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Samper-Montana has played against opponents with an average rank of while Peperzeel has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Samper-Montana has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peperzeel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Samper-Montana has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peperzeel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Samper-Montana 1 - 0 Peperzeel
20
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
20
Minor
Ret.
Rank
179
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
251
High
32
Age
R
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
56% (442-346)
Career Total W/L
58% (230-164)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$84,925
Career Prize Money
$720
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Samper-Montana VS Peperzeel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Jordi Samper-Montana | Gavin Van Peperzeel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
1st Serve % | 71% (37/52) | 65% (51/79) |
1st Serve Win% | 81% (30/37) | 61% (31/51) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (8/15) | 50% (14/28) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/2) |
Return Points W% | 43% (34/79) | 27% (14/52) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Samper-Montana VS Peperzeel H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jordi Samper-Montana | Gavin Van Peperzeel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jordi Samper-Montana Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | 7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gengo Kikuchi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Len Schouten
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Palaphoom Kovapitukted
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ko Suzuki
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
90
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Shohei Chikami
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Pol Toledo Bague
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Gavin Van Peperzeel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Michael Look
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
65 of
94)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
33 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Dayne Kelly
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
59%
(
67 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
5
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
5
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
46 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gavin Van Peperzeel
Player
Edward Bourchier
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lucas Vuradin
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
58%
(
65 of
113)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
111)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
53 of
73)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Renta Tokuda
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Luke Saville
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gavin Van Peperzeel
Player
Renta Tokuda
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Gavin Van Peperzeel
Player
Ken Onishi
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
77%
(
95 of
123)
14
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
59 of
95)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
123)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andrew Harris
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-7(7) 7-6(4) 7-6(5) 1-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more