Jordi Samper-Montana vs Daniel Labrador Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Samper-Montana vs Labrador analysis and find out who is favored!
Jordi Samper-Montana vs Daniel Labrador Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Samper-Montana has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Labrador has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Samper-Montana, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Labrador has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Samper-Montana has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Labrador has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Samper-Montana has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Labrador winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Samper-Montana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 69/ 51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Labrador has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 7/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Samper-Montana winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Samper-Montana winning 2 and Labrador winning 0. The last match between Samper-Montana and Labrador was at the Spain F26 (Oviedo), 04-09-2018, First, Clay with Jordi Samper-Montana getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Samper-Montana and Labrador have played a deciding set 0 times, with Samper-Montana winning 0 times and Labrador 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Samper-Montana winning 0, and Labrador 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Samper-Montana has played against opponents with an average rank of while Labrador has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Samper-Montana has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Labrador has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Samper-Montana has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Labrador has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Samper-Montana 1 - 0 Labrador
20
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
20
Minor
Ret.
Rank
179
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (442-346)
Career Total W/L
50% (9-9)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$84,925
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Samper-Montana VS Labrador H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Jordi Samper-Montana | Daniel Labrador |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (38/60) | 57% (37/65) |
1st Serve Win% | 61% (23/38) | 57% (21/37) |
2nd Serve Win% | 64% (14/22) | 21% (6/28) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 40% (2/5) |
Return Points W% | 58% (38/65) | 38% (23/60) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Samper-Montana VS Labrador H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-1 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Daniel Labrador
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jordi Samper-Montana | Daniel Labrador |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jordi Samper-Montana Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | 7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gengo Kikuchi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Len Schouten
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Palaphoom Kovapitukted
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ko Suzuki
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
90
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Shohei Chikami
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Pol Toledo Bague
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Labrador Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Daniel Labrador
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Peter Heller
Player
Daniel Labrador
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Labrador
Player
Mehdi Laalej
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 3-6 7-5 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-6 6-0 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF |
Oliver Crawford
Player
Daniel Labrador
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more