Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jordi Samper-Montana vs Andre Ghem Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Samper-Montana vs Ghem analysis and find out who is favored!
Jordi Samper-Montana vs Andre Ghem Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Samper-Montana has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ghem has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Samper-Montana, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ghem has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Samper-Montana has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ghem has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Samper-Montana has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ghem winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Samper-Montana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 69/ 51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Ghem has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 354/ 267), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Samper-Montana winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Samper-Montana winning 3 and Ghem winning 2. The last match between Samper-Montana and Ghem was at the Trnava Challenger, 11-08-2016, Second, Clay with Jordi Samper-Montana getting the victory 1100038335.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:10:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Samper-Montana and Ghem have played a deciding set 1 times, with Samper-Montana winning 0 times and Ghem 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Samper-Montana winning 1, and Ghem 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Samper-Montana has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ghem has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Samper-Montana has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ghem has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Samper-Montana has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ghem has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Samper-Montana 1 - 1 Ghem
Ret.
Rank
179
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
118
High
41
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
56% (442-346)
Career Total W/L
56% (451-351)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$84,925
Career Prize Money
$71,898
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Samper-Montana VS Ghem H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jordi Samper-Montana | Andre Ghem |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 28 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:10:13 | 2:10:13 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (129/186) | 59% (100/169) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (79/129) | 65% (65/100) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (33/57) | 45% (31/69) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (8/17) | 40% (8/20) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (73/169) | 40% (74/186) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Samper-Montana VS Ghem H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Andre Ghem
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-4 6-7(1) 7-5 |
Stats
Andre Ghem
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
55%
(
66 of
119)
1st Serve %
67%
(
76 of
114)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
43%
(
23 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
50 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
117
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jordi Samper-Montana | Andre Ghem |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jordi Samper-Montana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gengo Kikuchi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Len Schouten
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Palaphoom Kovapitukted
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ko Suzuki
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
90
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Shohei Chikami
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Toledo Bague
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Andre Ghem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Duckhee Lee
Player
Andre Ghem
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Andre Ghem
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andre Ghem
Player
Fabiano De Paula
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andre Ghem
Player
Claudio Kligerman
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Andre Ghem
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bradley Mousley
Player
Andre Ghem
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
8
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Andre Ghem
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andre Ghem
Player
Hernan Casanova
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
82%
(
59 of
72)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ghem
Player
Christian Oliveira
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Samper-Montana Vs Ghem Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
