Jordan Thompson vs Raphael Collignon Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In the past six months, Thompson has shown superior second serve performance, claiming victory in 51.75% of points compared to Collignon's 43.69%. Could this advantage indicate a potential edge for Thompson? It's likely.
• Analyzing return stats, Collignon surpasses Thompson with a 48.16% success rate in capturing opponents' second serve points, while Thompson's rate is 39.57%. In first serve returns, Collignon again leads with 27.52% against Thompson's 22.98%.
• When facing pressure, Thompson holds a slight edge by saving 63.74% of breakpoints, compared to Collignon's 53.53%. This could be crucial for in-play betting predictions.
• Over the last year, Thompson has won less frequently, with a 48.48% success rate in matches, whereas Collignon has achieved a higher win rate of 64.62%.
• Thompson performs best on indoor hard surfaces with a 65% win rate, while Collignon excels on clay, maintaining a 73% win rate.
• In terms of playing level, Thompson competes mainly at Masters events, boasting a 53.85% win rate, while Collignon plays primarily at Challenger and ITF levels, with a stronger 75% win rate.
• The quality of opponents also differs significantly; Thompson's average opponent rank is 58, much higher than Collignon's average of 205.12. Is Thompson tested against tougher competition? Indeed.
• In matches reaching a deciding set, Collignon shows slightly better performance with a 64% success rate, while Thompson records 55% wins.
• Regarding break point conversion, Collignon has been more effective recently, converting 35.03% of opportunities against Thompson's 24.74%. This might impact in-game strategies and outcomes.

Editorial Prediction (September 14, 2025, UTC):

On examining recent performances, Thompson holds a distinct advantage in second serve points won; however, Collignon's return game has been more robust, potentially neutralizing Thompson's serve advantage.

When analyzing pressure situations, Thompson's higher breakpoint save percentage could prove important. Nevertheless, Collignon's overall win rate and decisive set performance indicate he can handle high-stakes scenarios.

The disparity in opponent quality faced presents another layer, with Thompson competing against higher-ranked players. Yet, Collignon's consistent winning record at lower-tier events suggests his ability to capitalize on his strengths and opportunities.

Taking all these factors into account, Collignon's stronger recent form and return game could give him the edge needed to secure victory, providing he maintains his current momentum.

Thus, while Thompson's strengths shouldn't be underestimated, Collignon appears the more likely candidate to triumph in the upcoming match.