Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jonathan Eysseric vs Clement Tabur Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Eysseric vs Tabur analysis and find out who is favored!
Jonathan Eysseric vs Clement Tabur Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Eysseric has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Tabur has won 48.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Eysseric, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tabur has won 54.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Eysseric has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tabur has saved 58.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Eysseric has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Tabur winning 70.93% (W/L 61/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Eysseric has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 338/ 217), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Tabur has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 73/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 29/ 34).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Eysseric winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Eysseric winning 2 and Tabur winning 0. The last match between Eysseric and Tabur was at the M25 Jounieh, 04-10-2019, Quarterfinals, Clay with Jonathan Eysseric getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Eysseric and Tabur have played a deciding set 0 times, with Eysseric winning 0 times and Tabur 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Eysseric winning 0, and Tabur 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Eysseric has played against opponents with an average rank of while Tabur has played against players with an average rank of 264.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Eysseric has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tabur has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Eysseric has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tabur has converted 38.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Eysseric 1 - 0 Tabur
898
Rank
202
High
33
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
204
Rank
202
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
55% (477-385)
Career Total W/L
61% (239-153)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (11-11)
$71,205
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jonathan Eysseric | Clement Tabur |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:0 | 1:56:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (44/69) | 65% (52/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (34/44) | 58% (30/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (14/25) | 50% (14/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (3/12) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (36/80) | 30% (21/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Jonathan Eysseric
Player
Clement Tabur
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jonathan Eysseric | Clement Tabur |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (11/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (23/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (235/219) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 61 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 75 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:47:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 263.45 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (902/1463) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (614/902) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (268/561) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 36% (64/180) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (624/1498) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (6/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (11/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (9/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (9/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 15% (13/2) |
Jonathan Eysseric Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
84)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
13
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
98)
10
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Jonathan Eysseric
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonathan Eysseric
Player
Dan Added
53%
(
59 of
112)
1st Serve %
59%
(
63 of
106)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
45%
(
24 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Tabur
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Clement Tabur
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yibing Wu
Player
Clement Tabur
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Clement Tabur
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Clement Tabur
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
15%
(
3 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Damien Wenger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Calvin Hemery
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
15
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Hernan Casanova
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Emilien Voisin
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Eysseric Vs Tabur Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Clement Tabur
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
