Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jonathan Binding vs Deney Wassermann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Binding vs Wassermann analysis and find out who is favored!
Jonathan Binding vs Deney Wassermann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Binding has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Wassermann has won 51.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Binding, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wassermann has won 49.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Binding has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wassermann has saved 62.39% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Binding has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Wassermann winning 53.49% (W/L 23/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Binding has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 52/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 19/ 22). Wassermann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 68/ 47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Binding winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Binding winning 1 and Wassermann winning 2. The last match between Binding and Wassermann was at the M15 Heraklion, 18-11-2019, Q2 round, Hard with Deney Wassermann getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Binding and Wassermann have played a deciding set 1 times, with Binding winning 0 times and Wassermann 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Binding winning 0, and Wassermann 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Binding has played against opponents with an average rank of while Wassermann has played against players with an average rank of 180.79.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Binding has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wassermann has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Binding has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wassermann has converted 32.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Binding 0 - 1 Wassermann
N/A
Rank
High
31
Age
L
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
715
Rank
696
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
53% (85-75)
Career Total W/L
59% (99-70)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (6-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Binding VS Wassermann H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jonathan Binding | Deney Wassermann |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 14 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Binding VS Wassermann H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 10-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jonathan Binding | Deney Wassermann |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (13/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (117/106) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.41 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:37:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 133.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 54% (389/721) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (285/389) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (173/332) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 28% (25/88) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (296/762) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Jonathan Binding Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Finn Murgett
Player
Jonathan Binding
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonathan Binding
Player
Nicholas Jovanovski
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leonardo Catani
Player
Jonathan Binding
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Brugnerotto
Player
Jonathan Binding
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
40%
(
29 of
73)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonathan Binding
Player
Suraj R Prabodh
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jonathan Binding
Player
Anvit Bendre
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dalwinder Singh
Player
Jonathan Binding
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
12
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Deney Wassermann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Deney Wassermann
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
47%
(
7 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
18
Total Points Won
10
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Deney Wassermann
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
15 of
26)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Andrey Chepelev
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Henry Searle
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
67%
(
75 of
112)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Deney Wassermann
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
43
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Deney Wassermann
38%
(
3 of
8)
1st Serve %
58%
(
7 of
12)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikolay Nedelchev
Player
Deney Wassermann
78%
(
77 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Sergio Callejon Hernando
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Imanol Lopez Morillo
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
76%
(
26 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
15 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Deney Wassermann
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
47 of
95)
6
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Binding Vs Wassermann Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
